[This transcript was provided verbatim by ABC News. Based on the segments broadcast on ABC's Good Morning America, there are 17 edits, some mid-sentence, that edited out 1,393 words (36%) accounting for an estimated 00:07:48 of time (37.7%). 1,089 words (37.7%) of Biden's answers and 34.7% of Stephanopoulos' questions (384 words) were removed.] [This transcript is presented verbatim as provided by ABC News. The video was re-edited to include all 17 breaks and inserts the removed portion as text on screen so it can be viewed in full context, with the text occupying the approximate length of the edited section. Source: ABC News. URL: https://f2.link/abc-biden-20210818-source] [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Mr. President, thank you for doing this. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Thank you for doin' it. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Let's get right to it. [Broadcast on ABC] Back in July, you said a Taliban takeover was highly unlikely. Was the intelligence wrong, or did you downplay it? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I think -- [Broadcast on ABC] There was no consensus. If you go back and look at the intelligence reports, they said that it's more likely to be sometime by the end of the year. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] The idea that the tal -- and then it goes further on, even as late as August. I think you're gonna see -- the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and others speaking about this later today. [Broadcast on ABC] You didn't put a timeline on it when you said it was highly unlikely. You just said flat out, "It's highly unlikely the Taliban would take over." [Broadcast on ABC] Yeah. Well, the question was whether or not it w -- the idea that the Taliban would take over was premised on the notion that the -- that somehow, the 300,000 troops we had trained and equipped was gonna just collapse, they were gonna give up. I don't think anybody anticipated that -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] But you know that Senator McConnell, others say this was not only predictable, it was predicted, including by him, based on intelligence briefings he was getting. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] What -- what did he say was predicted? [Broadcast on ABC] Senator McConnell said it was predictable that the Taliban was gonna take over. [Broadcast on ABC] Well, by the end of the year, I said that's that was -- that was a real possibility. But no one said it was gonna take over then when it was bein' asked. [Broadcast on ABC] So when you look at what's happened over the last week, was it a failure of intelligence, planning, execution or judgment? [Broadcast on ABC] Look, I don't think it was a fa -- look, it was a simple choice, George. When the -- when the Taliban -- let me back -- put it another way. When you had the government of Afghanistan, the leader of that government get in a plane and taking off and going to another country, when you saw the significant collapse of the -- Afghan troops we had trained -- up to 300,000 of them just leaving their equipment and taking off, that was -- you know, I'm not -- this -- that -- that's what happened. [Broadcast on ABC] That's simply what happened. So the question was in the beginning the -- the threshold question was, do we commit to leave within the timeframe we've set? We extended it to September 1st. Or do we put significantly more troops in? I hear people say, "Well, you had 2,500 folks in there and nothin' was happening. You know, there wasn't any war." [Broadcast on ABC] But guess what? The fact was that the reason it wasn't happening is the last president negotiated a year earlier that he'd be out by May 1st and that -- in return, there'd be no attack on American forces. That's what was done. That's why nothing was happening. But the idea if I had said -- I had a simple choice. [Broadcast on ABC] If I had said, "We're gonna stay," then we'd better prepare to put a whole hell of a lot more troops in -- [Broadcast on ABC] But your top military advisors warned against withdrawing on this timeline. They wanted you to keep about 2,500 troops. [Broadcast on ABC] No, they didn't. It was split. Tha -- that wasn't true. That wasn't true. [Broadcast on ABC] They didn't tell you that they wanted troops to stay? [Broadcast on ABC] No. Not at -- not in terms of whether we were going to get out in a timeframe all troops. They didn't argue against that. [Broadcast on ABC] So no one -- no one told -- your military advisors did not tell you, "No, we should just keep 2,500 troops. It's been a stable situation for the last several years. We can do that. We can continue to do that"? [Broadcast on ABC] No. No one said that to me that I can recall. Look, George, the reason why it's been stable for a year is because the last president said, "We're leaving. And here's the deal I wanna make with you, Taliban. We're agreeing to leave if you agree not to attack us between now and the time we leave on May the 1st." [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I got into office, George -- [Broadcast on ABC] Less than two months after I elected to office, I was sworn in, all of a sudden, I have a May 1 deadline. I have a May 1 deadline. I got one of two choices. Do I say we're staying? And do you think we would not have to put a hell of a lot more troops? B -- you know, we had hundreds -- we had tens of thousands of troops there before. [Broadcast on ABC] Tens of thousands. Do you think we woulda -- that we would've just said, "No problem. Don't worry about it, we're not gonna attack anybody. We're okay"? In the meantime, the Taliban was takin' territory all throughout the country in the north and down in the south, in the Pasthtun area. [Broadcast on ABC] So would you have withdrawn troops like this even if President Trump had not made that deal with the Taliban? [Broadcast on ABC] I would've tried to figure out how to withdraw those troops, yes, because look, George. There is no good time to leave Afghanistan. Fifteen years ago would've been a problem, 15 years from now. The basic choice is am I gonna send your sons and your daughters to war in Afghanistan -- in Afghanistan in perpetuity? [Broadcast on ABC] That's -- [Broadcast on ABC] No one can name for me a time when this would end. And what -- wha -- wha -- what -- what constitutes defeat of the Taliban? What constitutes defeat? Would we have left then? Let's say they surrender like before. OK. Do we leave then? Do you think anybody -- the same people who think we should stay would've said, "No, good time to go"? We spent over $1 trillion, George, 20 years. There was no good time to leave. [Broadcast on ABC] But if there's no good time, if you know you're gonna have to leave eventually, why not have th -- everything in place to make sure Americans could get out, to make sure our Afghan allies get out, so we don't have these chaotic scenes in Kabul? [Broadcast on ABC] Number one, as you know, the intelligence community did not say back in June or July that, in fact, this was gonna collapse like it did. Number one. [Broadcast on ABC] They thought the Taliban would take over, but not this quickly? [Broadcast on ABC] But not this quickly. Not even close. We had already issued several thousand, um, passports to the -- the SIVs, the people -- the -- the -- the translators when I came into office before we had negotiated getting out at the end of s -- August. Secondly, we're in a position where what we did was took precautions. [Broadcast on ABC] That's why I authorized that there be 6,000 American troops to flow in to accommodate this exit, number one. And number two, provided all that aircraft in the Gulf to get people out. We pre-positioned all that, anticipated that. Now, granted, it took two days to take control of the airport. We have control of the airport now. [Broadcast on ABC] Still a lotta pandemonium outside the airport. [Broadcast on ABC] Oh, there is. But, look, b -- but no one's being killed right now, God forgive me if I'm wrong about that, but no one's being killed right now. People are -- we got 1,000-somewhat, 1,200 out, yesterday, a couple thousand today. And it's increasing. We're gonna get those people out. [Broadcast on ABC] But we've all seen the pictures. We've seen those hundreds of people packed into a C-17. You've seen Afghans falling -- [Broadcast on ABC] That was four days ago, five days ago. [Broadcast on ABC] What did you think when you first saw those pictures? [Broadcast on ABC] What I thought was we ha -- we have to gain control of this. We have to move this more quickly. We have to move in a way in which we can take control of that airport. And we did. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I -- I think a lot of -- a lot of Americans, and a l -- even a lot of veterans who served in Afghanistan agree with you on the big, strategic picture. They believe we had to get out. But I wonder how you respond to an Army Special Forces officer, Javier Mackey. He did seven tours. He was shot twice. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] He agrees with you. He says, "We have to cut our losses in Afghanistan." But he adds, "I just wish we could've left with honor." [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Look, that's like askin' my deceased son Beau, who spent six months in Kosovo and a year in Iraq as a Navy captain and then major -- I mean, as an Army major. And, you know, I'm sure h -- he had regrets comin' out of Afganista -- I mean, out of Iraq. He had regrets to what's -- how -- how it's going. But the idea -- what's the alternative? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] The alternative is why are we staying in Afghanistan? Why are we there? Don't you think that the one -- you know who's most disappointed in us getting out? Russia and China. They'd love us to continue to have to -- [Broadcast on ABC] So you don't think this could've been handled, this exit could've been handled better in any way? No mistakes? [Broadcast on ABC] No. I -- I -- I don't think it could've been handled in a way that there -- we -- we're gonna go back in hindsight and look, but the idea that somehow there's a way to have gotten out without chaos ensuing, I don't know how that happens. I don't know how that happened. [Broadcast on ABC] So for you, that was always priced into the decision? [Broadcast on ABC] Yes. Now, exactly what happened -- is not priced in. But I knew that they're gonna have an enormous, enorm -- look, one of the things we didn't know is what the Taliban would do in terms of trying to keep people from getting out, what they would do. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] What are they doing now? They're cooperating, letting American citizens get out, American personnel get out, embassies get out, et cetera. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] But they're having -- we're having some more difficulty in having those who helped us when we were in there -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] And we don't really know what's happening outside of Kabul. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Pardon me? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] We don't really know what's happening outside of Kabul. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Well -- we do know generically and in some specificity what's happening outside of Kabul. We don't know it in great detail. But we do know. And guess what? The Taliban knows if they take on American citizens or American military, we will strike them back like hell won't have it. [Broadcast on ABC] All troops are supposed to be out by August 31st. Even if Americans and our Afghan allies are still trying to get out, they're gonna leave? [Broadcast on ABC] We're gonna do everything in our power to get all Americans out and our allies out. [Broadcast on ABC] Does that mean troops will stay beyond August 31st if necessary? [Broadcast on ABC] It depends on where we are and whether we can get -- ramp these numbers up to 5,000 to 7,000 a day coming out. If that's the case, we'll be -- they'll all be out. [Broadcast on ABC] 'Cause we've got, like, 10,000 to 15,000 Americans in the country right now, right? And are you committed to making sure that the troops stay until every American who wants to be out -- [Broadcast on ABC] Yes. [Broadcast on ABC] -- is out? [Broadcast on ABC] Yes. [Broadcast on ABC] How about our Afghan allies? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] We have about 80,000 people -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Well, that's not the s -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Is that too high? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] That's too high. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] How many -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] The estimate we're giving is somewhere between 50,000 and 65,000 folks total, counting their families. [Broadcast on ABC] Does the commitment hold for them as well? [Broadcast on ABC] The commitment holds to get everyone out that, in fact, we can get out and everyone that should come out. And that's the objective. That's what we're doing now, that's the path we're on. And I think we'll get there. [Broadcast on ABC] So Americans should understand that troops might have to be there beyond August 31st? [Broadcast on ABC] No. Americans should understand that we're gonna try to get it done before August 31st. [Broadcast on ABC] But if we don't, the troops will stay -- [Broadcast on ABC] If -- if we don't, we'll determine at the time who's left. [Broadcast on ABC] And? [Broadcast on ABC] And if you're American force -- if there's American citizens left, we're gonna stay to get them all out. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] You talked about our adversaries, China and Russia. You already see China telling Taiwan, "See? You can't count on the Americans." [Laughs] [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Sh -- why wouldn't China say that? Look, George, the idea that w -- there's a fundamental difference between -- between Taiwan, South Korea, NATO. We are in a situation where they are in -- entities we've made agreements with based on not a civil war they're having on that island or in South Korea, but on an agreement where they have a unity government that, in fact, is trying to keep bad guys from doin' bad things to them. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] We have made -- kept every commitment. We made a sacred commitment to Article Five that if in fact anyone were to invade or take action against our NATO allies, we would respond. Same with Japan, same with South Korea, same with -- Taiwan. It's not even comparable to talk about that. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Yeah, but those -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] It's not comparable to t -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] -- who say, "Look, America cannot be trusted now, America does not keep its promises -- " [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Who -- who's gonna say that? Look, before I made this decision, I met with all our allies, our NATO allies in Europe. They agreed. We should be getting out. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Did they have a choice? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Sure, they had a choice. Look, the one thing I promise you in private, NATO allies are not quiet. You remember from your old days. They're not gonna be quiet. And so -- and by the way, you know, what we're gonna be doing is we're gonna be putting together a group of the G-7, the folks that we work with the most -- to -- I was on the phone with -- with Angela Merkel today. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I was on the phone with the British prime minister. I'm gonna be talking to Macron in France to make sure we have a coherent view of how we're gonna deal from this point on. [Broadcast on ABC] What happens now in Afghanistan? Do you believe the Taliban have changed? [Broadcast on ABC] No. I think -- let me put it this way. I think they're going through sort of an existential crisis about do they want to be recognized by the international community as being a legitimate government. I'm not sure they do. But look, they have -- [Broadcast on ABC] They care about their beliefs more? [Broadcast on ABC] Well, they do. But they also care about whether they have food to eat, whether they have an income that -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] -- they can provide for their f -- that they -- [Broadcast on ABC] can make any money and run an economy. They care about whether or not they can hold together the society that they in fact say they care so much about. I'm not counting on any of that. [Broadcast on ABC] But that is part of what I think is going on right now in terms of I -- I'm not sure I would've predicted, George, nor would you or anyone else, that when we decided to leave, that they'd provide safe passage for Americans to get out. [Broadcast on ABC] Beyond Americans, what do we owe the Afghans who are left behind, particularly Afghan women who are facing the prospect of subjugation again? [Broadcast on ABC] As many as we can get out, we should. For example, I had a meeting today for a couple hours in the Situation Room just below here. There are Afghan women outside the gate. I told 'em, "Get 'em on the planes. Get them out. Get them out. Get their families out if you can." But here's the deal, George. The idea that we're able to deal with the rights of women around the world by military force is not rational. [Broadcast on ABC] Not rational. Look what's happened to the Uyghurs in western China. Look what's happening in other parts of the world. Look what's happenin' in, [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] -- you know, in -- [Broadcast on ABC] -- in the Congo. I mean, there are a lotta places where women are being subjugated. The way to deal with that is not with a military invasion. The way to deal with that is putting economic, diplomatic, and national pre -- international pressure on them to change their behavior. [Broadcast on ABC] How about the threat to the United States? Most intelligence analysis has predicted that Al-Qaeda would come back 18 to 24 months after a withdrawal of American troops. Is that analysis now being revised? Could it be sooner? [Broadcast on ABC] It could be. But George, look, here's the deal. Al-Qaeda, ISIS, they metastasize. There's a significantly greater threat to the United States from Syria. There's a significantly greater threat from East Africa. There's significant greater threat to other places in the world than it is from the mountains of Afghanistan. [Broadcast on ABC] And we have maintained the ability to have an over-the-horizon capability to take them out. We're -- we don't have military in Syria to make sure that we're gonna be protected -- [Broadcast on ABC] And you're confident we're gonna have that in Afghanistan? [Broadcast on ABC] Yeah. I'm confident we're gonna have the over-the-horizon capability, yes. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Look, George, it's like asking me, you know, am I confident that people are gonna act even remotely rationally. Here's the deal. [Broadcast on ABC] The deal is the threat from Al-Qaeda and their associate organizations is greater in other parts of the world to the United States than it is from Afghanistan. [Broadcast on ABC] And th -- that tells you that you're -- it's safe to leave? [Broadcast on ABC] No. That tells me that -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] -- my dad used to have an expression, George. If everything's equally important to you, nothing's important to you. [Broadcast on ABC] We should be focusing on where the threat is the greatest. And the threat -- the idea -- we can continue to spend $1 trillion and have tens of thousands of American forces in Afghanistan when we have what's going on around the world, in the Middle East and North Africa and west -- I mean, excuse me -- yeah, North Africa and Western Africa. [Broadcast on ABC] The idea we can do that and ignore those -- those looming problems, growing problems, is not -- not rational. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Final question on this. You know, [Broadcast on ABC] In a couple weeks, we're all gonna commemorate the 20th anniversary of 9/11. The Taliban are gonna be ruling Afghanistan -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] -- just l -- [Broadcast on ABC] -- like they were when our country was attacked. How do you explain that to the American people? [Broadcast on ABC] Not true. It's not true. They're not gonna look just like they were we were attacked. There was a guy named Osama bin Laden that was still alive and well. They were organized in a big way, that they had significant help [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] from arou -- [Broadcast on ABC] -- from other parts of the world. We went there for two reasons, George. Two reasons. [Broadcast on ABC] One, to get Bin Laden, and two, to wipe out as best we could, and we did, the Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. We did it. Then what happened? Began to morph into the notion that, instead of having a counterterrorism capability to have small forces there in -- or in the region to be able to take on Al-Qaeda if it tried to reconstitute, we decided to engage in nation building. [Broadcast on ABC] In nation building. That never made any sense to me. [Broadcast on ABC] It sounds like you think we shoulda gotten out a long time ago -- [Broadcast on ABC] We should've. [Broadcast on ABC] -- and -- and accept the idea that it was gonna be messy no matter what. [Broadcast on ABC] Well, by the -- what would be messy? [Broadcast on ABC] The exit -- [Broadcast on ABC] If we had gotten out a long time ago -- getting out would be messy no matter when it occurred. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I ask you, you want me to stay, you want us to stay and send your kids back to Afghanistan? How about it? Are you g -- if you had a son or daughter, would you send them in Afghanistan now? Or later? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Would be hard, but a lot of families have done it. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] They've done it because, in fact, there was a circumstance that was different when we started. We were there for two reasons, George. And we accomplished both ten years ago. We got Osama bin Laden. As I said and got criticized for saying at the time, we're gonna follow him to the gates of hell. Hell, we did -- [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] How will history judge the United States' experience in Afghanistan? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] One that we overextended what we needed to do to deal with our national interest. That's like my sayin' they -- they're -- they -- they b -- b -- the border of Tajikistan -- and -- other -- what -- does it matter? Are we gonna go to war because of what's goin' on in Tajikistan? What do you think? Tell me what -- where in that isolated country that has never, never, never in all of history been united, all the way back to Alexander the Great, straight through the British Empire and the Russians, what is the idea? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Are we gonna s -- continue to lose thousands of Americans to injury and death to try to unite that country? What do you think? I think not. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I think the American people are with me. And when you unite that country, what do you have? They're surrounded by Russia in the north or the Stans in the north. You have -- to the west, they have Iran. To the south, they have Pakistan, who's supporting them. And to the -- and -- actually, the east, they have Pakistan and China. Tell me. Tell me. Is that worth our national interest to continue to spend another $1 trillion and lose thousands more American lives? For what? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] I know we're outta time. I have two quick questions on COVID. I know you're gonna make -- be makin' an announcement on booster shots today. Have you and the first lady gotten your booster shots yet? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] We're gonna get the booster shots. And -- it's somethin' that I think -- you know, because we g -- w -- we got our shots all the way back in I think December. So it's -- it's -- it's past time. And so the idea [Noise in background] that the recommendation -- that's my wife calling. [Laughs] No. [Laughs] But all kiddin' aside, yes, we will get the booster shots. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] And -- and finally -- are you comfortable with Americans getting a third shot when so many millions around the world haven't had their first? [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Absolutely because we're providing more to the rest of the world than all the rest of the world combined. We got enough for everybody American, plus before this year is -- before we get to the middle of next year, we're gonna provide a half a billion shots to the rest of the world. We're keepin' our part of the bargain. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] We're doin' more than anybody. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Mr. President, thanks for your time. [Edited Out / Removed on Broadcast] Thank you.