Fact
ba
.
se
Press Conference: Karine Jean-Pierre Holds a Press Briefing at The White House - April 15, 2024
-
John Kirby Person
-
Question Person
-
Karine Jean-Pierre Person
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:00:00-00:00:01 (2 sec)
"Good afternoon, everyone."
1
Question
Positive
00:00:01-00:00:02 (1 sec)
"Good afternoon."
2
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:00:02-00:00:32 (30 sec)
"So I just have a, just something really quick at the top. The mics are always funky. Is it funky? No? Oh, OK. Let's get going. With all seriousness, though, it was obviously a very busy weekend at the White House. The president spent hours in the Situation Room closely monitoring the latest developments in the Middle East with his national security team."
3
Karine Jean-Pierre
Leans Positive
00:00:32-00:01:05 (33 sec)
"He was engaged in extensive diplomacy speaking with Israeli Prime minister on Saturday night and convening a call with G7 leaders on Sunday morning. The president also organized a joint statement with the G7 that strongly condemn Iran's brazen and unprecedented attack. Today, the president received an updated briefing from his national security team and as you all know, met with the leaders of Iraq and will meet with the leaders of the Czech Republic later this afternoon."
4
Karine Jean-Pierre
Somewhat Positive
00:01:05-00:01:17 (12 sec)
"With that, we have my NBC colleague, Admiral John Kirby, who's here to do a much deeper dive, and also take your questions on the Middle East."
5
John Kirby
Negative
00:01:17-00:01:42 (25 sec)
"Somebody's do [Inaudible]. Good afternoon. As you all know and certainly Karine restated it, Iran and its proxies operating in Yemen, Syria and Iraq also, conducted an unprecedented attack on the state of Israel with over 300 weapons, including more than 100 ballistic missiles as well as land attack, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles or drones."
6
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:01:42-00:02:05 (23 sec)
"President Biden instructed the United States to defend Israel to the maximum extent possible and defeat that attack and we did. With the support of our partners, the United States enabled Israel to spectacularly defeat it. Despite launching more than those 300 weapons from Iran in the region, Israel and a coalition of partners were able to defeat 99 percent of the attacks."
7
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:02:05-00:02:30 (25 sec)
"There was virtually no infrastructure damage to Israel, but their attack requires an unequivocal condemnation from the international community. And so as Karine said, the president convened the G7 yesterday and they have forcefully condemned that attack and urged for calm and de-escalation. And I'd like to take just a few minutes to correct the record on a few points that have come out in the last several hours."
8
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:02:30-00:02:56 (26 sec)
"I've seen reporting that the Iranians meant to fail, that this spectacular and embarrassing failure was all by design. I've also seen Iran say that they provided early warning to help Israel prepare its defenses and limit any potential damage. All of this is categorically false. To coin the phrase from the president, or steal a phrase from the president, it's malarkey."
9
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:02:56-00:03:27 (30 sec)
"This attack failed because it was defeated by Israel, by the United States and by a coalition of other partners committed to Israel's defense. So let's be straight. Given the scale of this attack. Iran's intent was clearly to cause significant destruction and casualties. Iranian leaders launched so many missiles and other munitions because they knew that many were going to be defeated, but the aim was to get as many of them through Israel's defenses as possible."
10
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:03:27-00:03:51 (25 sec)
"Now, I've also seen this speculation about messages past forth and warnings. We did receive messages from Iran, and they received messages from us too, but there was never any message to us or to anyone else on the timeframe, the targets or the type of response. In fact, before yesterday it was presumed that 100 ballistic missiles might overwhelm even the best defensive systems."
11
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:03:51-00:04:13 (22 sec)
"That was Iran's intent and as you all saw for yourself, it didn't work. This attack was defeated thanks to our preparations, to a coalition of committed partners and to Israel's remarkable defensive systems. And I want to focus on that last point for just a moment. Israel today is in a far stronger strategic position than it was only a few days ago."
12
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:04:13-00:04:31 (18 sec)
"Iran's vaunted missile program, something it has used to threaten Israel in the region proved to be far less effective. Israel's defenses on the other hand proved even better than many had long assumed. Israel's defense was strengthened by a coalition of countries led by the United States and working together."
13
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:04:31-00:05:02 (30 sec)
"The United States has never before so extensively and so directly defended Israel from attack. To ensure that that continues to be the case, the house of representatives must urgently pass the National Security Supplemental, which is already passed the Senate with overwhelming bipartisan support. That supplemental includes funding that the president requested for the Iron Dome and David Sling system, systems that saved countless lives this weekend and have saved many lives from Hamas and from Hezbollah rockets over the past six months."
14
John Kirby
Leans Positive
00:05:02-00:05:25 (23 sec)
"Passing that bill is the fastest and surest way to get Israel the aid it needs, and we must act urgently to replenish Israel's air defenses just as Congress must act urgently to replenish Ukraine's air defenses, which also continue to be attacked every single day with the same Iranian-made drones. And finally, much of the world today is standing with Israel."
15
John Kirby
Leans Positive
00:05:25-00:05:40 (15 sec)
"When the president spoke to the G7 leaders yesterday, they were unified in their condemnation of Iran and their determination to hold Iran accountable. At the president's direction, our teams are now following up with G7 capitals on new multilateral sanctions to target Iran's missile and other nefarious programs."
16
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:05:40-00:06:01 (20 sec)
"G7 countries that had yet to designate the IRGC, a terrorist organization, are now considering doing so. And going forward, we will be working to further isolate Iran internationally and increase economic and other forms of pressure. So that's the upshot here, a stronger Israel, a weaker Iran, a more unified alliance of partners."
17
John Kirby
Neutral
00:06:01-00:06:24 (23 sec)
"That was not Iran's intent when it launched this attack on Saturday night, not even close and again, they failed. They failed utterly. Now, as you also know, President Biden is welcoming both the Iraqi prime minister and the Prime minister Petr Fiala of the Czech Republic to the White House. The president and Prime Minister al-Sudani from Iraq will discuss the US and Iraq's shared vision for our broad, multifaceted relationship."
18
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:06:24-00:06:35 (11 sec)
"During the meeting, these leaders will reaffirm their commitment to advancing regional stability to expanding opportunities for Iraq's people and reinforcing Iraq's sovereignty, security and stability."
19
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:06:35-00:06:54 (19 sec)
"The Iraqi prime minister will be here for almost a week, and in that time, he will meet a range of administration officials including both Secretary Blinken at the State Department and Secretary Austin at the Defense Department. He will have opportunities to share his priorities and vision for Iraq with a variety of audiences here in Washington and in other parts of the United States."
20
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:06:54-00:07:20 (26 sec)
"And of course, the president will be taking the opportunity to discuss how we will continue to work with Prime Minister Sudani to defuse regional tensions and to prevent Iraq from being drawn into conflict. Iraq, the president firmly believes, is central to the region's stability. And then later, as Karine previewed, he'll have a chance to meet with president -- I'm sorry, Prime Minister Fiala to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the Czech Republic as a NATO ally."
21
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:07:20-00:07:44 (24 sec)
"Over the past 25 years, our alliance has grown stronger and the relationship between our two countries have grown even closer as we've deepened defense cooperation, including through the Czech Republic's purchase of 24 F-35 fighters earlier this year. The president will congratulate the prime minister on legislation that Czechia recently passed requiring it to spend at least 2 percent of its GDP on defense, which, as you know is the NATO goal."
22
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:07:44-00:08:01 (18 sec)
"The leaders will also discuss their strong support for Ukraine, and the president will thank the prime minister for leading an effort to help secure nearly one million rounds of ammunition for Ukraine. And one more thing, if you'll just bear with me. I'm almost done. Today marks the one year conflict in Sudan."
23
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:08:01-00:08:16 (15 sec)
"Since fighting erupted a year ago, civilians have been forced to bear the brunt of this senseless conflict. Thousands have been killed and wounded. Women and girls have been kidnapped and assaulted. Hundreds of thousands of families have been displaced. Communities and livelihoods have been utterly destroyed."
24
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:08:16-00:08:31 (15 sec)
"And famine now is threatening to take hold. That's why the United States continues to commit resources to create conditions for a potential peace process, to hold accountable actors who are seeking to sow more violence, and to ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches the civilians who urgently need it."
25
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:08:31-00:08:43 (12 sec)
"We reiterate our calls for all parties in this conflict to lay down their weapons and put an end to this intolerable violence for the future of Sudan, but most of all for the future of the Sudanese people. Thank you. Appreciate your patience."
26
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:08:43-00:08:45 (2 sec)
"Go ahead, Sonya."
27
Question
Negative
00:08:45-00:08:53 (8 sec)
"Israel's military, as you just said, quote, "there will be a response to the attack in Iran." So, does the US have any indication of what those next steps are from Israel?"
28
John Kirby
Neutral
00:08:53-00:08:55 (2 sec)
"We will let the Israelis speak to that."
29
Question
Neutral
00:08:55-00:08:58 (4 sec)
"Does the US expect to be consulted in advance of them taking any next steps?"
30
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:08:58-00:09:09 (11 sec)
"I -- I won't get into our diplomatic conversations or expectations. The Israeli government will determine for themselves if there's going to be a response and what that response is going to look like."
31
Question
Neutral
00:09:09-00:09:21 (11 sec)
"And are you able to discuss the specific roles played by other members of the regional coalition from over the weekend, specifically Jordan and Saudi Arabia, whether they helped shoot down missiles, or what other actions they may have done?"
32
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:09:21-00:09:25 (4 sec)
"No, I think we'll let other members of the coalition speak for themselves."
33
Question
Neutral
00:09:25-00:09:35 (10 sec)
"John, Israel is reportedly looking at options that would send a message to Iran but not cause casualties. Is the administration presenting alternatives to Netanyahu?"
34
John Kirby
Neutral
00:09:35-00:09:45 (10 sec)
"This is -- these -- this is an Israeli decision to make, whether and how they'll respond to what Iran did on Saturday. And we're going to leave it squarely with them."
35
Question
Neutral
00:09:45-00:09:48 (3 sec)
"Their decision to make, but are you making suggestions?"
36
John Kirby
Neutral
00:09:48-00:09:54 (6 sec)
"We are not involved in their decision making process about a potential response."
37
Question
Neutral
00:09:54-00:09:58 (4 sec)
"And just is the president -- does he have any plans to speak to Netanyahu again?"
38
John Kirby
Neutral
00:09:58-00:10:07 (9 sec)
"I don't have anything on the calendar to speak to. But, look, I mean, they've -- they've spoken frequently over the last six months. They'll absolutely speak again at the appropriate time."
39
Question
Negative
00:10:07-00:10:24 (17 sec)
"Thank you, Karine. John, just one day before the attack, President Biden issued a warning to Iran, don't, and now the US is not taking any part in an Israeli reprisal. So, does that signal to Iran that it can defy the US without facing any consequences?"
40
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:10:24-00:10:48 (24 sec)
"I don't know, man. If I'm sitting in Tehran and I'm taking a look at what just happened on Saturday night, I don't think I'd be betting that the United States is not willing to get engaged here and help defend Israel. I mean, you had American fighter pilots in the air in combat operations shooting down drones and missiles that were heading towards -- towards Israel, as well as US Navy destroyers at sea knocking them down from there."
41
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:10:48-00:10:58 (10 sec)
"So, the message should be very clear to anybody. When the president says we're going to take our commitments to the region seriously, when we're going to help Israel defend itself, we got skin in the game and we prove that."
42
Question
Neutral
00:10:58-00:11:02 (4 sec)
"I understand what you're saying about deterrence, but what about consequences?"
43
John Kirby
Positive
00:11:02-00:11:22 (20 sec)
"As I just said, and Karine also led in, he had a conversation with G7 leaders. He'll be engaging with other allies and partners. We have achieved -- we have seen swift condemnations about what Iran did from the international community, and we're going to be working with international partners to -- to -- to -- to work up options to hold Iran appropriately accountable."
44
Question
Neutral
00:11:22-00:11:36 (14 sec)
"And then just on the logistics of this, with roughly 300 drones and missiles shot down, can you talk about how you will assess the debris fields and the shrapnel and how much that impacted people on the ground?"
45
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:11:36-00:12:01 (25 sec)
"We're not going to be doing any kind of assessment of the impact on the ground. The Israeli Defense Forces and Israeli officials have already been out and about looking at the impact on the ground. There were very few missiles that got through. And the only damage that was done, it was very minor damage to one airbase in -- in Israel that did not even put that airbase out of commission."
46
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:12:01-00:12:14 (13 sec)
"The Israelis have already spoken to this. I believe they've already released imagery of some of the things they found on the ground. Sadly, a young girl, an innocent civilian less than ten years old, was severely wounded. That was the only casualty that we're aware of."
47
Question
Very Negative
00:12:14-00:12:32 (18 sec)
"Thank you, John. Thank you. John, a couple of questions on Iran and then on Iraq on the prime minister visit. You just said that the White House was not informed of the timing of the Iranian attack on Israel. But the president told us that the attack is going to be sooner than later, and almost a day after the attack happened."
48
Question
Neutral
00:12:32-00:12:33 (1 sec)
"So, just -- can you explain this one?"
49
John Kirby
Leans Negative
00:12:33-00:12:50 (17 sec)
"I never said we didn't have an idea. I never said we didn't have information that -- that -- that we could -- that we could act on and speak to our Israeli counterparts about. What I said was Iran never delivered a message giving us the time and the targets."
50
Question
Neutral
00:12:50-00:12:51 (1 sec)
"The exact timing?"
51
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:12:51-00:13:02 (11 sec)
"No, no, no, no, no, no. No timing. I mean, I want to be clear. This whole narrative out there that Iran passed us a message was what they were going to do is ridiculous."
52
Question
Neutral
00:13:02-00:13:05 (4 sec)
"Do you believe that Iranian nuclear sites is a legitimate target?"
53
John Kirby
Neutral
00:13:05-00:13:09 (4 sec)
"You're -- I'm not going to get into targeting discussions here from the podium."
54
Question
Very Positive
00:13:09-00:13:19 (10 sec)
"Okay. Let me ask you about the prime minister. Is the White House satisfied with the way that the Iraqi government is reining in the militias in Iraq, considering they are one of the focuses of the Iranian regime?"
55
John Kirby
Leans Negative
00:13:19-00:13:48 (29 sec)
"We're going to -- we're going to have a in-depth discussion with the prime minister and his team about the continued activities of militia groups in Iraq, and -- and we'll reinforce our views about how seriously we take the force protection of our -- our troops and our facilities there. And we'll also expect -- I fully expect that -- that we'll talk with the prime minister about the counter ISIS mission in -- in Iraq and its potential future."
56
Question
Very Positive
00:13:48-00:14:06 (19 sec)
"And finally just one. He said in the spirit of partnership, we disagree with the United States. And he mentioned something like we need a new system for international law -- to respect international law, international humanitarian law, protection of civilians and diplomatic missions. So, he's hinting at the Israeli attack in Damascus."
57
Question
Leans Positive
00:14:06-00:14:13 (7 sec)
"He's also hinting about not doing enough to respect international law. Is this a point of disagreement between you and the Iraqi government?"
58
John Kirby
Neutral
00:14:13-00:14:30 (17 sec)
"You'll have to talk to the prime minister about what he meant by those comments. Iraq is a key partner, one we really value. We wouldn't be having this meeting today, he wouldn't be having meetings this week if it wasn't an important relationship. As I said, the president believe -- believes that Iraq is critical to regional stability."
59
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:14:30-00:14:31 (1 sec)
"Go ahead, [Inaudible]."
60
Question
Slightly Negative
00:14:31-00:14:44 (14 sec)
"Thanks, Karine. Thanks, Admiral. You said just now that this -- Iran's attack was a spectacular and embarrassing failure. Do you -- does the president believe that Israel should now take this as a win and show restraint?"
61
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:14:44-00:15:05 (21 sec)
"I know where the context of the question is coming in, during his conversation with the prime minister on Saturday night. First of all, he congratulated the prime minister for the exceptional effort by the Israeli Defense Forces and, of course, commended, as you would expect the commander in chief to do, the participation of US forces in this coalition and the great work that was done."
62
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:15:05-00:15:19 (15 sec)
"I mean, it's easy -- you know, I was looking some -- looking at some of the video before I came out here that's running on some of your networks. And, you know, it's easy to look at that like it's some kind of a computer game, right? It looks so simple. Things get knocked out of the sky. Let me tell you something."
63
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:15:19-00:15:44 (25 sec)
"It's not simple. It's hard, and a lot of planning and preparation had to go into that, and a lot of coordination. And the president talked to the prime minister about that. He also noted that this was an extraordinary success, a military success, and that that success alone just for itself speaks volumes about Israel's standing in the region, that they -- they don't stand alone, that a coalition came to help them defend themselves."
64
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:15:44-00:16:04 (20 sec)
"It also says a lot about Israel's military superiority, and it says just as much about Iran's military inferiority when it came to this particular set of attacks. And the president urged the prime minister to think about what that success says all by itself to the rest of the region."
65
Question
Neutral
00:16:04-00:16:11 (7 sec)
"But in terms of thinking about, I mean, but think about restraint about, you know, that maybe this should not go further, that, you know, further to --"
66
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:16:11-00:16:25 (15 sec)
"All -- all I'll say is the -- the president, from the beginning of this conflict on October 7th, has been steadfast and consistent. We don't want to see a war with Iran. We don't want to see a broader regional conflict. We will do what we have to do to defend Israel."
67
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:16:25-00:16:26 (1 sec)
"Go ahead, [Inaudible]."
68
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:16:26-00:16:33 (7 sec)
"Yes. Does the -- this administration believe Israel will indeed strike Iran? Is it your assessment that that is inevitable at this point?"
69
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:16:33-00:16:36 (3 sec)
"That's going to be up to the prime minister and the War Cabinet to speak to."
70
Question
Neutral
00:16:36-00:16:37 (1 sec)
"But your assessment or the administration --"
71
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:16:37-00:16:48 (11 sec)
"I'm not going to provide intelligence assessments from here. As far as I know, the War Cabinet is still debating and talking about their next steps, I think I'm going to let them speak to whatever their next steps might be."
72
Question
Neutral
00:16:48-00:16:56 (8 sec)
"And if I may also ask one question on Gaza, what is the administration's assessment of the timeline for a Rafah invasion given the conversations that you all have been having?"
73
John Kirby
Neutral
00:16:56-00:17:02 (6 sec)
"Again, you're asking me a question that really should be asked to the Israeli Defense Forces and the Prime Minister, not to the United States."
74
Question
Neutral
00:17:02-00:17:08 (6 sec)
"But I know you guys have been having conversations. I just want to get a sense of are these ongoing conversations still?"
75
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:17:08-00:17:29 (21 sec)
"Yes, of course, we're talking to the Israelis all the time. Now, obviously, in the last 48 hours, particularly, the conversation has been about what Iran did. But yes, we have continued to talk to them about what's going on down in Rafah and we expect, hope in coming days to be able to have yet another round of discussions with them about what their intentions are with respect to Rafah."
76
John Kirby
Neutral
00:17:29-00:17:33 (4 sec)
"But the focus rightly right now is on what Iran just did."
77
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:17:33-00:17:44 (11 sec)
"On the US military, given whatever the White House and President Biden know about what's going to happen next in the Middle East, are there any fresh US military preparations?"
78
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:17:44-00:17:46 (2 sec)
"Fresh military preparations for?"
79
Question
Neutral
00:17:46-00:17:53 (8 sec)
"Whatever. Wide open."
80
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:17:53-00:18:10 (17 sec)
"Yes. I mean, we're always looking at force protection in the region. We're always looking at our force posture. We're always evaluating it based on the threats and the challenges. You can expect that Secretary Austin and the entire team over there at the Department of Defense is going to stay vigilant to whatever the threat might be."
81
Question
Neutral
00:18:10-00:18:30 (20 sec)
"Thanks. You said a moment ago that it's ridiculous this narrative that Iran provided some advance notice about specifics here, but where we're hearing that from specifically is US ally Turkey, US partner Iraq. That's where that information is coming from. So what is the discrepancy exactly that's happening there?"
82
John Kirby
Negative
00:18:30-00:18:49 (19 sec)
"I can't possibly answer that question, Trevor. All I'm telling you is it's nonsense. I mean, think about this for a minute. Can you imagine a world in which Iran would pick up the phone and say, hey, we're about to try to shwhack Israel with 300 cruise missiles and drones. We just wanted to let you know it's coming."
83
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:18:49-00:19:10 (21 sec)
"And oh, by the way, here's what we're going to hit. I'm sorry, it just didn't happen. I can't account for what sources might be telling you all about what they heard. I'm telling you what we heard. And while we did get a message from Iran and we passed messages to Iran as well, which I won't get into the details of, none of it was, here's the targets, here's the timeframe, here's the munitions we're going to put on target."
84
Question
Neutral
00:19:10-00:19:21 (12 sec)
"And on that subject of communications with Iran generally, you said without preconditions you're willing to sit down with North Korea. Does the same apply to Iran and to reopening some diplomatic discussions with them?"
85
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:19:21-00:19:22 (1 sec)
"No."
86
Question
Slightly Negative
00:19:22-00:19:24 (2 sec)
"No. And do you want to elaborate on --"
87
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:19:24-00:19:24 ( sec)
"No."
88
Question
Slightly Positive
00:19:24-00:19:41 (17 sec)
"-- why that is? OK. As far as sanctions in response to Iran, Iranian oil production is now higher than it was two years ago. Is there a reason that you aren't taking more steps against Iranian oil exports? And does it have to do with domestic political pressures around gas prices?"
89
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:19:41-00:20:02 (21 sec)
"I don't have any -- as you know, we don't preview sanctions and I'm not going to start doing that today, except to note what I said in my opening statement that part of the discussion with the G7 leaders was the possibility of additional sanctions on Iran, unilaterally and hopefully multilaterally, but we'll see where that goes."
90
Question
Slightly Negative
00:20:02-00:20:08 (6 sec)
"And anything on where the oil prices, or oil exports are coming from Iran and whether you want to stop that?"
91
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:20:08-00:20:15 (8 sec)
"Again, I won't get ahead of economic pressure tools that we might be applying in the future. We're working our way through that."
92
Question
Positive
00:20:15-00:20:31 (15 sec)
"A US official told CNN over the weekend that the Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin asked his Israeli counterpart to notify the US ahead of any potential response to the Iran attack. Is there confidence that Israel will provide that advanced notification to the US?"
93
John Kirby
Neutral
00:20:31-00:20:35 (4 sec)
"I'll just tell you that we are and will remain in very close contact with our Israeli counterparts."
94
Question
Neutral
00:20:35-00:20:37 (2 sec)
"So do you expect to get an advance notification?"
95
John Kirby
Neutral
00:20:37-00:20:39 (2 sec)
"We will stay in close contact with our Israeli counterparts."
96
Question
Somewhat Negative
00:20:39-00:20:54 (14 sec)
"On the hostage talks, the Hamas rejected the latest proposal. The US has said that Hamas has rejected the deal, but do you think Israel needs to allow Gazans to return home unrestricted? And should the IDF pull back so they can do that?"
97
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:20:54-00:21:12 (19 sec)
"First of all, we don't consider it a dead letter. As far as we're concerned, there's a viable proposal on the table and Hamas ought to take it. And we're not letting up on the idea of negotiating for a hostage deal so we can get a ceasefire so we can get more aid in, but that's still very much an active football in our heads."
98
John Kirby
Positive
00:21:12-00:21:44 (32 sec)
"And as for movement north, what we've talked to the Israelis about is, you got a million and a half people that are seeking refuge down in Rafah. It's by far the largest concentration of Palestinians in Gaza. They need to be accounted for. Whatever kind of military operation they're thinking about doing in Rafah or anywhere else, to your point about moving north, they have to provide safe venues for them to do that."
99
John Kirby
Neutral
00:21:44-00:21:51 (8 sec)
"They have to provide food, water, medicine, shelter. All that has to be baked into whatever future military operations happen on the ground in Gaza."
100
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:21:51-00:21:59 (8 sec)
"That does sound though like you're saying that Israel should consider allowing Gazans to move up north, which has been a sticking point in those hostage --"
101
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:21:59-00:22:13 (14 sec)
"We want to see them account for the future safety and security of the more than a million refugees that are now taking refuge down near Rafah, with whatever -- baked into whatever military plans they might have for operations on the ground."
102
Question
Neutral
00:22:13-00:22:31 (18 sec)
"On the ceasefire negotiations, a US officials said yesterday that the latest proposal included almost everything that Hamas had asked for. And so how is it that the negotiations are at a standstill at this point? Is the US planning another counter proposal?"
103
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:22:31-00:22:52 (21 sec)
"I don't know of a new proposal. There is a very good proposal on the table that CIA Director Bill Burns helped negotiate in Cairo a week or so ago, that the Israelis were able to get behind. And now it's time for Hamas to step up and take that deal. It will allow for dozens of the hostages, the most at risk pool of them to get out."
104
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:22:52-00:23:01 (9 sec)
"And it will allow for about six weeks of a ceasefire, so we can get some calm and we can increase humanitarian assistance. There's a deal on the table, that's what Hamas needs to take."
105
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:23:01-00:23:13 (12 sec)
"And when the president spoke yesterday to congressional leaders, did he receive any sort of a commitment from House Speaker Mike Johnson to bring the bipartisan National security supplemental bill to the house floor this week?"
106
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:23:13-00:23:43 (31 sec)
"I'll let the speaker speak to whatever his plans might be. Certainly, we heard from Leader McConnell and from Leader Jeffries about the importance of passing this supplemental and getting it on its way. And as I said in my opening statement, the fastest way -- I mean you got two good friends here, Israel and Ukraine, very different fights to be sure, but active fights for their sovereignty and for their safety and security."
107
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:23:43-00:23:59 (16 sec)
"And time is not on anyone's side here in either case, so they need to move quickly on this. And the best way to get that aid into the hands of the IDF and into the hands of the Ukrainian soldiers is to pass that bipartisan bill that the Senate passed."
108
Question
Neutral
00:23:59-00:24:08 (8 sec)
"I understand that that's your preference, the bipartisan bill that the Senate passed, but is the White House opposed to an approach that takes the issue separately --"
109
John Kirby
Positive
00:24:08-00:24:18 (10 sec)
"We are opposed to a standalone bill that would just work on Israel, as we've seen proposed. We would oppose a standalone bill, yes."
110
Question
Very Positive
00:24:18-00:24:25 (7 sec)
"Admiral, I know you said it was Israel's decision, but to ask it bluntly, if Israel retaliates against Iran, would the US support that?"
111
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:24:25-00:24:43 (18 sec)
"To answer it bluntly, I'm not going to get into hypotheticals. We don't want to see a war with Ukraine. We don't want to see a wider conflict. As the president said to the prime minister on Saturday night, we will continue to do what we have to do to help Israel defend itself. But you're asking me to get ahead of, as far as I know, a decision that the War Cabinet hasn't even made."
112
Question
Neutral
00:24:43-00:24:46 (3 sec)
"But if it were to happen, does --"
113
John Kirby
Positive
00:24:46-00:24:50 (4 sec)
"It's a terrific hypothetical, Gabe, that I'm just not going to entertain."
114
Question
Positive
00:24:50-00:24:57 (8 sec)
"Thanks. John, has President Biden considered, maybe beefing up the public Iran posture to be more than just one word?"
115
John Kirby
Neutral
00:24:57-00:24:59 (2 sec)
"You're referring to, don't?"
116
Question
Slightly Positive
00:24:59-00:25:00 (1 sec)
"Yeah. Because he said --"
117
John Kirby
Neutral
00:25:00-00:25:02 (1 sec)
"And so let's talk about --"
118
Question
Neutral
00:25:02-00:25:04 (2 sec)
"-- don't and they did it anyway, so now what?"
119
John Kirby
Neutral
00:25:04-00:25:36 (32 sec)
"And let's talk about what we did, Peter. Let's talk about don't and did. Let's talk about Saturday night. He made it clear that he didn't want to see escalation in the region and -- let me finish. He added military resources to the region right after October 7th. And then when we had an inkling that this kind of thing was coming, he added even more military resources to the region, more destroyers that were capable of shooting down ballistic missiles, a fighter squadron that was able to shoot down drones, and that's what we did."
120
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:25:36-00:26:03 (27 sec)
"So you can talk about the don't word all you want, but let's talk about what did happen and what did happen was Iran utterly failed. And if I'm sitting in Tehran right now, I'm betting that President Biden takes it pretty seriously when he says don't escalate, he's going to act to make sure that you can't. And they didn't. Yes, they fired an unprecedented amount of munitions, but how much of a success did they have, Peter, none, zero, very little infrastructure."
121
John Kirby
Somewhat Negative
00:26:03-00:26:07 (4 sec)
"It was an embarrassing failure for the supreme leader and for the IRGC."
122
Question
Very Negative
00:26:07-00:26:20 (12 sec)
"Now that we know that the Iranians do not listen to President Biden's public warnings, is there any regret here about unfreezing billions of dollars for Iranian leaders during the president's administration?"
123
John Kirby
Neutral
00:26:20-00:26:21 (2 sec)
"What unfreezing are you talking about?"
124
Question
Neutral
00:26:21-00:26:23 (2 sec)
"He unfrozen billions of dollars --"
125
John Kirby
Neutral
00:26:23-00:26:27 (4 sec)
"For Iranian leaders, really? I don't think so."
126
Question
Slightly Positive
00:26:27-00:26:31 (3 sec)
"OK. You guys say it's for humanitarian purposes, but doesn't that --"
127
John Kirby
Neutral
00:26:31-00:26:32 (1 sec)
"But you don't believe me?"
128
Question
Slightly Negative
00:26:32-00:26:39 (7 sec)
"Well doesn't that free up money for them to spend on other stuff? Where do you get the money for an unprecedented number of munitions to fire at Israel?"
129
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:26:39-00:27:09 (30 sec)
"So first of all, I'm betting if they're sitting in Tehran, they're taking it seriously when President Biden says he's going to defend Israel. We put skin in the game, a whole heck of a lot of it, and knocked almost everything out of the sky. So, I'm betting they're taking it pretty seriously. And as for this -- this unfreezing, none of that fund, none of those funds, funds set up in an account, by the way, by the previous administration goes directly to the supreme leader or the IRGC, can only be used for humanitarian purposes."
130
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:27:09-00:27:13 (4 sec)
"And we're watching that account very, very closely to make sure that that's what happens."
131
Question
Neutral
00:27:13-00:27:23 (11 sec)
"And you guys often defend all the trips to Delaware by saying the president is not on vacation. He's working. He can be the president from anywhere. So, why'd he have to come back on Saturday?"
132
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:27:23-00:27:55 (32 sec)
"Well, we got indications -- shortly after arriving, we got better, firmer intelligence and information about the -- the specific timing of what we expected to be this Iranian attack. And the president didn't bat an eye before getting back on that helicopter and coming back. And he was here all Saturday night in the Situation Room, from mid-afternoon til late at night getting real time updates from General Kurilla and from his defense team all throughout the night, including calling Prime Minister Netanyahu right from the Situation Room."
133
John Kirby
Neutral
00:27:55-00:28:04 (9 sec)
"And as Karim mentioned, on Sunday he was right back at it again, working the G7, calling King Abdullah. I don't know what else to tell you. He had a very busy full weekend."
134
Question
Very Negative
00:28:04-00:28:13 (9 sec)
"John, on Iran, what is the current thinking on whether Iran's Revolutionary Guard should be designated as a terrorist organization?"
135
John Kirby
Neutral
00:28:13-00:28:14 (1 sec)
"We already have."
136
Question
Neutral
00:28:14-00:28:21 (8 sec)
"And then just do you have any update on getting additional humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza? You'd said --"
137
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:28:21-00:28:22 ( sec)
"Yeah."
138
Question
Neutral
00:28:22-00:28:27 (5 sec)
"Last week that you had 300 trucks on Wednesday. And with the weekend's events --"
139
John Kirby
Neutral
00:28:27-00:28:47 (21 sec)
"Yeah. And forgive me. I don't know if Karine might have already briefed this out to you guys. But, you know, over the last week or so, more than 2,000 trucks have gotten in. And even throughout the course of the weekend as Israel was dealing with a quite daunting attack by Iran, they were still able to get some trucks into Gaza."
140
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:28:47-00:29:10 (23 sec)
"So, in these early days after the previous phone call with Prime Minister Netanyahu, where the president talked about the need to increase humanitarian assistance, we have seen Israel take steps to -- to -- to do exactly that. Now, as we've also said, it's still not enough. The -- the need is dire, and what we're going to be doing is watching for sustained commitment to doing that over time."
141
John Kirby
Positive
00:29:10-00:29:14 (4 sec)
"But -- but thus far, there has been an increase in humanitarian assistance."
142
Question
Very Negative
00:29:14-00:29:31 (17 sec)
"This one on the timing of the -- of any type of warning. So, are you saying Iran never told a US partner, Switzerland, Oman, any of them, Turkey, Iraq, never gave them any information about the attack they were preparing to launch, and that information never reached the US?"
143
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:29:31-00:29:47 (16 sec)
"The United States had no messages from Iran or from anybody else, as I said in my opening statement, that -- that the -- that offered a specific timeframe or a specific set of targets, or the types of weapons that they were going to fire."
144
Question
Negative
00:29:47-00:29:57 (10 sec)
"So, just concretely, why would US partners in Turkey, Jordan, Iraq lie about passing along Iranian messages about any forthcoming attack?"
145
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:29:57-00:30:22 (26 sec)
"Look, I'm not -- I'm not calling anybody a liar here. I'm telling you from our perspective what we knew and what we didn't know. And we were able to help with Israel's defenses. Because we had information that we had received and Israel had received through our own -- our own efforts. But it never came as some sort of message from Iran with, I mean, the timing and the target."
146
John Kirby
Positive
00:30:22-00:30:33 (11 sec)
"I -- it's -- it's -- it kind of boggles my mind that anybody would believe that Iran would pick up the phone and tell the United States, who -- who they know --"
147
Question
Positive
00:30:33-00:30:36 (3 sec)
"Or partners would tell the United States."
148
John Kirby
Positive
00:30:36-00:31:02 (26 sec)
"-- who -- who they know is -- been very, very directly involved with helping Israel defend itself and very public about doing that, and detail the times and the targets. Look, this to me seems like a lot of, you know, Monday morning quarterbacking kind of stuff, woulda, coulda, shoulda, and -- and maybe they want to make it appear like, you know, this was some sort of small pinprick of an attack that they never meant to succeed."
149
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:31:02-00:31:17 (15 sec)
"You can't throw that much metal in the air, which they did, in the time frame in which they did it and convince anybody realistic that you weren't trying to cause casualties and you weren't calling -- trying to cause damage. They absolutely were."
150
Question
Neutral
00:31:17-00:31:23 (7 sec)
"And just one more. Is the meeting with Israeli -- Israeli officials on Rafah still -- is that happening this week?"
151
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:31:23-00:31:29 (6 sec)
"I don't have a date for you. We're still trying to get that nailed down. As I said earlier, we'd like to continue those conversations."
152
Question
Very Positive
00:31:29-00:31:54 (25 sec)
"Thank you, Karine. Hi, Admiral. House Majority Leader Scalise said on Friday that Speaker Johnson was negotiating with the White House modifications to the Ukraine aid package. Are you -- what is being negotiated? And you just categorically said that the White House opposes a standalone Israel bill --"
153
John Kirby
Neutral
00:31:54-00:31:55 (1 sec)
"That's right."
154
Question
Slightly Negative
00:31:55-00:32:06 (11 sec)
"Supplemental. Are you also opposed to changes to the supplemental, for example, changing aid to alone?"
155
John Kirby
Positive
00:32:06-00:32:10 (4 sec)
"I know it would make your jobs a lot easier if I negotiated this thing up here in public."
156
Question
Slightly Negative
00:32:10-00:32:11 (1 sec)
"No, I just --"
157
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:32:11-00:32:33 (22 sec)
"But I'm not going to do that. You're right. The president did have an opportunity to speak with Speaker Johnson and other congressional leaders, including -- including McConnell and Jeffries. And he made it clear that the best and the fastest way to stand by our allies and partners is for the House of Representatives to take up the bipartisan bill that the Senate passed."
158
Question
Slightly Negative
00:32:33-00:32:38 (6 sec)
"But are you also opposed to the modifications and changes as you opposed the stand alone?"
159
John Kirby
Neutral
00:32:38-00:32:39 (1 sec)
"I've answered the question."
160
Question
Very Positive
00:32:39-00:32:50 (10 sec)
"Thank you so much, John. First of all, thank you for your dedication this weekend and keeping us all informed. I think we all saw more of you than our own families, which is real cool."
161
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:32:50-00:32:54 (4 sec)
"You certainly saw more of me than my family did. [Laughter]"
162
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:32:54-00:33:12 (18 sec)
"I have two questions. First of all, administration officials told us on Sunday that they had help from India, China, and Iraq. Can you just detail, you know, some -- give us some of the details on that? And does that represent a move forward in US-China relations that you were able to cooperate on -- in thwarting this attack?"
163
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:33:12-00:33:23 (12 sec)
"Yeah, as I said earlier, I think I'll let other countries speak to their participation and cooperation and -- to the degree that -- that they're comfortable doing that. I can only speak for the United States and what we did."
164
Question
Neutral
00:33:23-00:33:25 (2 sec)
"Does this represent a step forward for the --"
165
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:33:25-00:33:47 (22 sec)
"I think what -- I think what it says is, without getting into the specific contributions of other countries, as I said in my opening statement, it shows that Israel's not standing alone. That -- I mean, that unlike Iran, which is increasingly isolated on the world stage, Israel has friends. Israel has great skill, great professionalism, great military capability."
166
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:33:47-00:33:53 (7 sec)
"And that's not by accident. All of that comes from the support that they get, particularly from the United States, but other countries as well."
167
Question
Neutral
00:33:53-00:34:04 (11 sec)
"And then if the US can -- and allies can help shoot down Iranian drones over Israel, why can't they do the same over Ukraine?"
168
John Kirby
Very Negative
00:34:04-00:34:29 (24 sec)
"Yeah, I knew this question was coming too. Look, different conflicts, different conflicts, different airspace, different threat picture. And the president has been clear since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine the United States is not going to be involved in that -- that conflict in a combat role, and we haven't. We have been providing Ukraine the tools that they need to help defend their airspace."
169
John Kirby
Neutral
00:34:29-00:34:36 (7 sec)
"And unfortunately, we can't do that right now because we don't have that national security supplemental funding that -- that they so desperately need."
170
Question
Very Positive
00:34:36-00:35:02 (26 sec)
"The Syrian Christians are the indigenous people of Iraq. And before liberation, about 2.5 million and they're down to nearly 200,000. And just last month, the Iraqi Supreme Court removed all of their -- we had five seats in the Kurdish parliament for many decades and those were renewed -- were removed. Have you -- has that come up in any of the discussions?"
171
John Kirby
Neutral
00:35:02-00:35:03 (1 sec)
"I'll take the question."
172
Question
Very Positive
00:35:03-00:35:23 (20 sec)
"Thank you. Thank you, Karine. And thank you, John, for all you did over the weekend. I have two questions. First, you mentioned the shipping of aid to Gaza from Israel. Do we have a US consular official at the border who is confirming that the aid actually gets there?"
173
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:35:23-00:35:47 (24 sec)
"I'm not aware of a consular presence at the border, but we are -- I said constant touch with our Israeli counterparts. You know, we also have David Satterfield, who's the president's special envoy, for that exact purpose. And I mean, he's -- he's like Waldo. I mean, he's all over the place, constantly up and down, I mean, making sure that that stuff is getting in and keeping the president and the whole team fully informed."
174
Question
Positive
00:35:47-00:36:11 (24 sec)
"My other question is that, given the recent developments with Iran, is the US going to step up its contacts with the opposition to the current regime in Tehran? And I mean specifically exile groups in the United States, plus on the ground, the Baluchi, Azeri, the Kurds, and the Sunni who are in opposition to the regime?"
175
John Kirby
Negative
00:36:11-00:36:15 (4 sec)
"I don't know of any such efforts in the wake of the -- the attacks."
176
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:36:15-00:36:17 (2 sec)
"All right, a couple more. Way in the back, go ahead."
177
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:36:17-00:36:22 (5 sec)
"Thank you, John. Why is the US not going to participate in a counteroffensive?"
178
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:36:22-00:36:38 (16 sec)
"Again, I think I've answered this question. The president had a good chat with the prime minister. We talked about the incredible success that -- that we and they achieved on Saturday night, and -- and the message that that success sends not only to the region but also to Iran as well."
179
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:36:38-00:36:47 (9 sec)
"And as I've also said, as the president has certainly said, we're not looking for a war with Iran. We're not looking to broaden and deepen this conflict in the region."
180
Question
Neutral
00:36:47-00:36:51 (4 sec)
"How exactly is he trying to de-escalate this situation?"
181
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:36:51-00:37:07 (17 sec)
"Everything the president's been doing since the 7th of October has been designed to try to de-escalate and to try to keep the conflict from widening and deepening and that includes the moves that he made in the last 10, 12 days to add resources to the region, so that we could help Israel better defend itself."
182
John Kirby
Negative
00:37:07-00:37:23 (16 sec)
"And my goodness, it all paid off. I mean, instead of having 100 ballistic missiles land inside of Israel and cause untold damage to infrastructure and to human lives, none of that occurred. And the reason none of it occurred was because the president was ahead of the problem set."
183
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:37:23-00:37:24 (1 sec)
"Brian."
184
Question
Leans Positive
00:37:24-00:37:38 (14 sec)
"Thanks, Karine. John, just a couple of follow ups. The coalition to put together limiting Iran's development of nuclear weapons, is that's still solid in the face of what's going on."
185
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:37:38-00:38:01 (22 sec)
"As the president has said, we'd love nothing better than to be able to solve Iranian nuclear progress, nuclear weapons progress through diplomacy. Unfortunately, that's not an option right now because the Iranians well before any of this just weren't negotiating in good faith. None of the diplomatic efforts were paying off."
186
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:38:01-00:38:20 (19 sec)
"And so that effort kind of fell moribund as we look for other ways to increase pressure on Iran. The president has also said that while he would prefer to deal with this threat diplomatically, he also will make sure that he's got options and choices available to him to ensure that Iran never achieves a nuclear weapons capability."
187
Question
Neutral
00:38:20-00:38:25 (5 sec)
"But the countries that were backing that coalition, still a member, they're all China, Russia --"
188
John Kirby
Neutral
00:38:25-00:38:29 (4 sec)
"You're talking about a process that's just moribund right now, Brian? I mean --"
189
Question
Neutral
00:38:29-00:38:39 (10 sec)
"So the other follow up, the container ship. There have been rumors. The container ship that was seized by Iran, was there anything of a sensitive nature on it? Do we know what was on it?"
190
John Kirby
Neutral
00:38:39-00:38:45 (6 sec)
"I think I'd refer you to the Pentagon on that. I don't have an update on the cargo."
191
Question
Very Positive
00:38:45-00:38:49 (5 sec)
"Well, I want to thank you for using the word shwack and of course, where's Waldo."
192
John Kirby
Neutral
00:38:49-00:38:52 (3 sec)
"I'm going to hear about that [Inaudible]."
193
Question
Slightly Positive
00:38:52-00:39:00 (8 sec)
"But at the end, you understand the reason why the question about advanced knowledge because the president did come back early, and I think you spoke --"
194
John Kirby
Neutral
00:39:00-00:39:09 (8 sec)
"I didn't say -- I never said we didn't have an advanced sense of what -- what I said was we didn't get that sense from the Iranians sending us a telegram."
195
Question
Neutral
00:39:09-00:39:18 (9 sec)
"Right, but as Peter asked, I believe, there was -- we were told not specifics, but that something was going to occur."
196
John Kirby
Slightly Negative
00:39:18-00:39:20 (2 sec)
"No."
197
Question
Neutral
00:39:20-00:39:22 (2 sec)
"[Inaudible] for me."
198
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:39:22-00:39:51 (29 sec)
"It's not about being told. I think you all understand. We have lots of tools and vehicles through intelligence and other information methods to glean a picture of what an adversary may or may not do. Now sometimes it's right, sometimes it's not 100 percent right. We had a good sense of what Iran was planning to do, and we achieved that level of situational awareness on our own and working with our Israeli counterparts."
199
John Kirby
Neutral
00:39:51-00:40:06 (14 sec)
"The notion, the idea that Iran send us an email or picked up the phone and told us what they were planning to do is just ludicrous. It didn't happen. I don't know how else to be more clear about it."
200
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:40:06-00:40:09 (3 sec)
"Go ahead, Andrew, and then we'll wrap up."
201
Question
Very Positive
00:40:09-00:40:14 (4 sec)
"Thank you, John, and Happy Tax Day. Two for you here."
202
John Kirby
Neutral
00:40:14-00:40:15 (1 sec)
"[Inaudible] about that."
203
Question
Neutral
00:40:15-00:40:17 (2 sec)
"There's been reporting that --"
204
John Kirby
Neutral
00:40:17-00:40:17 (1 sec)
"He's right. [Laughter]"
205
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:40:17-00:40:18 (1 sec)
"Is that right?"
206
Question
Very Positive
00:40:18-00:40:27 (9 sec)
"OK. So there's been reporting that the president suggested to the prime minister that Israel take the win and not go further with an offensive response."
207
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:40:27-00:40:28 (1 sec)
"I have seen that. Yeah."
208
Question
Very Positive
00:40:28-00:41:07 (39 sec)
"I have colleagues who are reporting that Israel is very much in the process of planning an offensive response to this weekend's attacks. Given the political situation in Israel, Prime Minister Netanyahu's coalition, some of which is a bit extreme and his own situation, does the president have faith that the prime minister will not escalate the situation out of his own political interests as opposed to genuine Israeli security interests?"
209
Question
Neutral
00:41:07-00:41:09 (2 sec)
"And then I have an unrelated one for you."
210
John Kirby
Somewhat Negative
00:41:09-00:41:38 (30 sec)
"I'm not going to be able to get into Prime Minister Netanyahu's psychology or his political calculations or what's going into his decision making process. What I would tell you is that the president and the prime minister speak frequently, certainly as appropriate. And the president has been consistent publicly and privately that he doesn't want to see the war between Israel and Hamas escalate any more than it that it already has."
211
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:41:38-00:41:47 (9 sec)
"And he doesn't want to see a broader regional conflict and he's certainly not looking for a war with Iran and I am confident that the prime minister is aware of the president's concerns."
212
Question
Slightly Positive
00:41:47-00:41:59 (12 sec)
"OK. And on Gaza this morning, you said that Israel has been doing the things the president asked them to do, but we really need to see it sustained over time."
213
John Kirby
Neutral
00:41:59-00:42:01 (2 sec)
"And you want to know how long is that time?"
214
Question
Slightly Negative
00:42:01-00:42:02 (1 sec)
"No, sir."
215
John Kirby
Slightly Positive
00:42:02-00:42:03 (1 sec)
"OK."
216
Question
Neutral
00:42:03-00:42:28 (25 sec)
"That would imply that you didn't want to call it an ultimatum. But the conditions that the president laid out in his prior phone call with the prime minister, about the aid workers, the conditions on the ground for humanitarian workers and aid getting into Gaza, that that needed to change or there could be changes in US policy towards Gaza."
217
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:42:28-00:43:07 (38 sec)
"Can you just lay out here whether the president is considering that set of circumstances and Israel's defense against future attacks from nation states such as Iran to be separate things, that when you see we need to see it sustained over time, that the possibility of policy changes is still a reality separate and apart from the president's, as he calls it, ironclad commitment to Israeli security?"
218
John Kirby
Positive
00:43:07-00:43:29 (22 sec)
"I've said many times that both things are and can be true. You can be a staunch defender of Israel's defense and we are. And I think he proved that to a fairly well Saturday night and still be able to have some tough candid conversations with the way in which they are fighting Hamas inside Gaza, and those conversations are continuing."
219
John Kirby
Very Positive
00:43:29-00:43:56 (27 sec)
"And as I said, hopefully, we'll get to be able to, to sit down again with our Israeli counterparts about whatever their thinking is about Rafah. So both things are true. Both things can be true. And those are the discussions that we're having. You can be a good friend of Israel. In fact, I would argue that only a good friend can do what we did Saturday night, and yet still be willing to have tough conversations with the Israeli government about the prosecution of the operations they're conducting inside Gaza."
220
Question
Neutral
00:43:56-00:43:59 (3 sec)
"So they're being considered separate matters?"
221
John Kirby
Somewhat Positive
00:43:59-00:44:04 (5 sec)
"I think I've answered the question. Thank you for your patience."
222
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:44:04-00:44:12 (8 sec)
"Thank you. No worries. [Inaudible]. Hi. [Inaudible]. I feel like you guys got all the news of the day."
223
Question
Very Positive
00:44:12-00:44:15 (2 sec)
"[Inaudible] Happy Tax Day to you."
224
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:44:15-00:44:24 (10 sec)
"Happy Tax Day. I did take care of my taxes. I don't have a wife to take care of my taxes."
225
Question
Very Negative
00:44:24-00:44:38 (14 sec)
"Ouch. Just on the other sort of big news of the day, is the president going to be paying any sort of attention or will be briefed on the criminal proceedings of former President Trump in New York?"
226
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:44:38-00:44:57 (19 sec)
"Well, as you know, the president is pretty busy today. He has two bilats, as you know, as you just saw with the Iraqi prime minister and one with the Czech Republic. So it's a busy day focusing on, obviously, our national security priorities and continuing the strong alliances that we have with these two leaders."
227
Karine Jean-Pierre
Leans Positive
00:44:57-00:45:09 (12 sec)
"Obviously, two separate meetings and continuing to deliver for the American people. I'm sure he'll get an update at some point today, but his focus right now are the meetings that he has and what he continues to do every day."
228
Question
Very Negative
00:45:09-00:45:30 (21 sec)
"Right. And setting aside the fact that the former president is the current president's general election candidate or challenger for this year, what is President Biden and the White House's reaction to this moment in time? I mean, it is a historic occasion, occasions [Inaudible] say, but you have a former president going on criminal trial for the first time in history."
229
Question
Neutral
00:45:30-00:45:33 (3 sec)
"So what is the White House's reaction to that?"
230
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:45:33-00:46:00 (28 sec)
"I do want to be super mindful even me commenting on that and it is an ongoing case. I just want to be super, super mindful and not comment on an ongoing case, even if it's asking an opinion about the historic nature of what's happening and what's going to occur the next couple of weeks. So do want to be mindful, and he happens to be, as you just said, a candidate presidential candidate for 2024. So going to be mindful."
231
Karine Jean-Pierre
Slightly Positive
00:46:00-00:46:17 (17 sec)
"The president's going to continue to focus on the week ahead. He's going to be traveling as you all know to Pennsylvania. He has two important bilats today, and it's always about the American people for this president, and that's going to be his focus. Go ahead, Mary."
232
Question
Neutral
00:46:17-00:46:24 (7 sec)
"As you just mentioned, the president's heading to Pennsylvania again this week, he's making multiple visits to the state. Can you just give us a sense of what we can expect in the coming days?"
233
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:46:24-00:46:26 (1 sec)
"So it's -- coming day or coming --"
234
Question
Neutral
00:46:26-00:46:26 ( sec)
"Days."
235
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:46:26-00:46:45 (20 sec)
"OK. Days. I don't know if you said weeks. I'm like wow, weeks. Coming days, it's a three day swing to Pennsylvania. He starts it off tomorrow. He's going to start his trip in his hometown of Scranton, where he'll deliver remarks at a campaign event, so that's obviously a campaign event, so they will provide more details."
236
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:46:45-00:47:05 (20 sec)
"On Wednesday, he's going to travel to Pittsburgh, where he'll deliver remarks again on other pieces of the economic agenda. So, you can -- you can imagine a very strong focus on the economy this week. And so, we'll have more on that from us tomorrow on what Wednesday's going to look like. And then on Thursday, which is -- obviously he'll continue his swing."
237
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:47:05-00:47:22 (17 sec)
"He'll travel to Philadelphia for more campaign events. And certainly, the campaign will provide any details on that particular day. So, it's Tuesday and Thursday over the campaign priorities, obviously, and they'll speak to that. And then there's an economic focus on Wednesday. And so, we'll have more to share tomorrow on that."
238
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:47:22-00:47:23 ( sec)
"Go ahead."
239
Question
Very Negative
00:47:23-00:47:39 (16 sec)
"Thanks, Karine. So, first of all, with the Iraqi leader here, lawmakers in that country are set to vote on a bill that includes the death penalty or life in prison for same-sex relations. Would passing such a bill harm US ties?"
240
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:47:39-00:48:15 (36 sec)
"I mean, look, you saw the Iraqi prime minister and the president have a bilat today. And I think it shows the importance of that alliance and the continued diplomacy engagement that we've done, the president continues to do just across the globe, obviously. The president has been very, very -- I think very vocal about any type of -- well, supporting the LGBTQ+ community and has spoken out about any type of humanitarian -- or human rights, I should say, any -- you know, any human rights violations that we see from here."
241
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:48:15-00:48:42 (27 sec)
"And they -- we always have those honest conversations with -- with -- with leaders. And the president always has, again, those honest conversations. I'm not going to get into -- I'm not going to get ahead of what's happening currently in Iraq. But we've been pretty -- we've been pretty clear about making sure that human rights -- human rights -- any human rights violations, or if we see anything that is -- you know, that -- that we think needs -- we need to speak to, we do."
242
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:48:42-00:48:43 (1 sec)
"But I'm just going to be --"
243
Question
Neutral
00:48:43-00:48:44 (1 sec)
"But [Inaudible] will raise that issue today?"
244
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:48:44-00:49:03 (19 sec)
"Look, the president always raises human rights issues if it warrants with a -- with a leader. I'm going to be really mindful. We'll have a readout, obviously, of these two bilats. I can't say for sure that that's going to come up. But the president has never backed down from having these types of frank, honest conversation and where he stands."
245
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:49:03-00:49:07 (4 sec)
"And we know where he stands with that community, with the LGBTQ+ community."
246
Question
Very Negative
00:49:07-00:49:27 (20 sec)
"And one other topic. Tesla is laying off more than 10 percent of its global workforce on falling sales and intensified price war for EVs. Does the ongoing turmoil in the EV market and the very slow consumer transition away from internal combustion engine vehicles make you doubt your full throated commitment to this space?"
247
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:49:27-00:49:47 (20 sec)
"So, look -- and I think I've talked about this before. Look, when it comes to EV, we've seen -- we've seen EV sales, obviously, rise, record highs. And EVs are more affordable than ever, and I think that's important. Last year EV sales surpassed one million for the first time ever, a 50 percent increase."
248
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:49:47-00:50:19 (32 sec)
"And under this president, EV sales have more than quadrupled. Sales of hybrids and EVs are now a record high of 18 percent of all light duty vehicle sales. Average price of EV is down 20 percent a year ago. And so, look, the president has always talked about one of his priorities as it relates to the economy is lowering costs, and we see that with -- with these EV sales, obviously, and also creating a -- manufacturing jobs in order -- if you're seeing the EV sales go up, right, you're going to see a continuation of manufacturing jobs that are needed."
249
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:50:19-00:50:42 (23 sec)
"And so, that is important. We can -- we believe it's going to create jobs. I can't speak to Tesla's decision. They are a private -- obviously, private company. But we believe what we're trying to do and what we've been trying to do in the last couple of -- of years, whether it's manufacturing, whether it's dealing with the climate crisis, by making sure EVs are -- are available and creating EVs -- more EVs and lowering those costs is working."
250
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:50:42-00:50:45 (3 sec)
"And so, that's what's going to be the president's priority. Go ahead."
251
Question
Negative
00:50:45-00:50:56 (12 sec)
"House Speaker Mike Johnson has said that he'll move forward with a vote on additional Israel aid. If Congress were to pass additional aid for Israel and only that, will President Biden reject it?"
252
Karine Jean-Pierre
Negative
00:50:56-00:51:19 (22 sec)
"So, we've been very clear, my colleagues from here just moments ago, that we will not accept a standalone. A standalone would -- would actually not help Israel and Ukraine. It would actually delay the needs that they -- the -- the needs that the -- the needed aid that they obviously need to fight. You see what -- happening in Ukraine."
253
Karine Jean-Pierre
Slightly Positive
00:51:19-00:51:39 (21 sec)
"Obviously, the brave people of Ukrainian are fighting against a tyrant. We need to make sure that they have the assistance that they need. We saw what happened in Israel just over -- over the weekend and the leadership that this president has shown. It would -- it would actually -- it would actually not help them if we do a standalone, and we do not support a standalone."
254
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:51:39-00:52:01 (22 sec)
"What we want to see is that bipartisan national security supplemental that passed overwhelmingly, 70-29, in the Senate. And we believe if the -- if the speaker would to put that on the floor it would pass overwhelmingly. And so, that's what we want to see. The president made clear to the -- in that conversation that he had just yesterday with leader -- Leader Schumer, Leader, Jeffries, and the speaker."
255
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:52:01-00:52:15 (14 sec)
"He was very clear about that. We need -- the speaker needs to move forward on the bipartisan -- on the national security supplemental, which we believe would get a bipartisan -- overwhelming bipartisan support. That's what we want. That's what we have to see. A standalone we do not support."
256
Question
Positive
00:52:15-00:52:26 (11 sec)
"Did the president think that that conversation moved the needle at all? I mean, this supplemental has been at a standstill in Congress. So, in that conversation with House Speaker Mike Johnson, did he receive any commitment that these two would move together?"
257
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:52:26-00:52:54 (28 sec)
"I mean, look, you saw -- you heard from the leaders Leader Schumer. You've heard from Leader Jeffries. They called on the speaker to move forward. We saw what happened over the weekend. We see what happens every day in Ukraine, every day. And if they want to move quickly -- quickly, if they want to do this in an easy way, if the speaker wants to do this the easiest way pass possible, the fastest way possible, there is a -- there is a national security supplemental that is waiting, that is ready to be put on the floor."
258
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:52:54-00:53:07 (13 sec)
"We know it would get bipartisan support. We know this. We've heard from Republicans. We know where Democrats stand. And so, they have to put this on -- put this on -- you know, they gotta put this on the floor. The speaker has to move quickly, has to move quickly."
259
Question
Very Negative
00:53:07-00:53:15 (8 sec)
"On another topic, the Baltimore bridge crash is now under federal criminal investigation. Has the president been briefed on that? And has he been in touch with anyone in the Maryland delegation?"
260
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:53:15-00:53:37 (22 sec)
"So, what I'll say is the president is regularly updated on what's happening in Baltimore. Obviously, the port, moving forward with that is really important, getting the bridge back up. As you know, the Department of Transportation in the early days announced $60 million to help in that effort. We're going to continue to talk with the Maryland delegation on what they need and how much this is going to -- to cost to get that going."
261
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:53:37-00:53:47 (10 sec)
"But the president does get regularly updated. There's investigation happening, as you just stated. I'm not going to get in -- you know, I'm not going to comment to that. Gonna let that independent investigation move forward. Go ahead."
262
Question
Leans Negative
00:53:47-00:53:56 (9 sec)
"Thank you, Karine. Earlier this month, did President Biden tell Xi Jinping to stop supporting Russia's assault on Ukraine?"
263
Karine Jean-Pierre
Slightly Positive
00:53:56-00:54:18 (22 sec)
"Look, I'm not going to get into a diplomatic conversations. We had a readout of that call that he had about ten days ago with President Xi. It was an important call. It talked -- it was a continuation of their summit that they had in San Francisco a couple of months ago. And so, I'm just not going to get ahead of or go into details about private conversation."
264
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:54:18-00:54:23 (5 sec)
"I think the president -- and we have been very clear."
265
Question
Very Positive
00:54:23-00:54:43 (20 sec)
"Ok. So, the US has announced some sanctions and an executive order to address the support that China has given Russia in those months between the summit and now, but also said we are prepared to take further steps. So, is the administration going to do more to deter Beijing?"
266
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:54:43-00:55:09 (26 sec)
"So, look, you know the president certainly is -- is -- is -- he's going to underscore -- he's going to underscore the concerns, right, that he has to China while also reiterating our readiness to conduct diplomatic -- diplomacy with North Korea, right? That's a part of this too, and our determination to take steps to deter further provocations by the DPRK, obviously."
267
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:55:09-00:55:29 (21 sec)
"And also -- you know, so we're always going to be very clear about that. You spoke about the executive action. I'm just going to be super careful about what -- what was said between the two leaders. We did a readout. And we've been always very clear, always very clear to speak -- to speak very directly about our concerns and underscore our concerns to China."
268
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:55:29-00:55:32 (3 sec)
"But just to be clear, it came up?"
269
Karine Jean-Pierre
Leans Positive
00:55:32-00:55:37 (6 sec)
"Look, I'm just going to be really careful. You have the readout. I'm going to leave the readout speak for itself."
270
Question
Somewhat Positive
00:55:37-00:55:38 ( sec)
"Thank you."
271
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:55:38-00:55:39 (1 sec)
"Go ahead, Jeremy."
272
Question
Positive
00:55:39-00:55:45 (6 sec)
"Is the White House satisfied with the FISA renewal bill that passed the House and is headed to the Senate?"
273
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:55:45-00:55:55 (10 sec)
"Look, I think it's important that it moved out of the House and now it's going to go to the Senate. And we've talked about that. There was a deadline, as you know, and it needs to -- we've got to get going with the FISA. It's really important to get that done."
274
Question
Slightly Positive
00:55:55-00:55:59 (3 sec)
"Some of the changes, the -- the White House is Ok with, the reforms?"
275
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:55:59-00:56:14 (16 sec)
"Look, we are -- we are -- I think we're -- we're satisfied that it has gone -- it is moving. It's going to go to the Senate. We'll see what happens there. But it is -- we -- you've heard from us. You heard from even National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, who talked about that the last time he was at the podium."
276
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:56:14-00:56:19 (5 sec)
"It's -- it's -- it's important to our national security that we move forward with FISA. Now it's in the Senate. Go ahead."
277
Question
Very Positive
00:56:19-00:56:31 (12 sec)
"Yeah. Thanks, Karine. Want to ask about gas prices. They've been going up over the last month $0.20 a gallon. Is the president considering any new actions like releasing more oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve?"
278
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
00:56:31-00:56:52 (21 sec)
"So, don't have -- I don't have any new actions to read out. I will say -- I will note that gas prices remain well below their peak back in 2022. I think that's important. And the -- the average gas price right now is cheaper than this time last year and that's because of what this president has been doing over the last three years, including the SPR."
279
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:56:52-00:57:10 (19 sec)
"And look, let's not forget, jobs are up, wages are up, clean energy manufacturing is up. All of these things are incredibly important because of this president's historic investment that he has made. And so -- but I think it's important to note that it remains well below the 2020 peak, 2022 peak. Pardon me."
280
Question
Slightly Positive
00:57:10-00:57:23 (12 sec)
"But it's only $0.03 lower than a year ago. It's up 52 percent from when President Biden came in office. Any then talk about changes in policy to encourage future investment in oil and gas?"
281
Karine Jean-Pierre
Leans Positive
00:57:23-00:57:44 (22 sec)
"So look, the president is committed to lowering cost. He is. That is something that you see at the center of every economic policy. When you hear him giving remarks, he's talking about lowering costs. He understands how the American people are still being squeezed. And so the reason that it remains below 2022, the gas prices as you're asking me, is because of the historic investment that this president has made."
282
Karine Jean-Pierre
Leans Positive
00:57:44-00:58:05 (20 sec)
"So of course we're going to continue to monitor and do everything that we can to answer those questions by the American people, what else can we do to lower cost, but it is important that it is cheaper. It is cheaper to get gas than it was a year ago and that's because of what this president has been doing, because of historic investment that he's taken."
283
Question
Very Positive
00:58:05-00:58:18 (13 sec)
"Thanks, Karine. To follow up on that, is there any indication that when the president had asked for the richest Americans to pay their fair share, that inflation and the rise in gas prices are linked to that request?"
284
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:58:18-00:58:19 (1 sec)
"Say that one more time."
285
Question
Very Positive
00:58:19-00:58:29 (10 sec)
"Do you think that the rise in prices of gas and inflation, which is still rising, is linked to the president's request that the richest Americans pay their fair share?"
286
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:58:29-00:58:51 (22 sec)
"Look, here's what I will say. The way we see the economy is very different than the way republicans see the economy and how we make sure we have an economy that works for all. Making sure that the wealthiest among us, the billionaires and corporations pay their fair share, we believe is the way to go here, not putting that burden on everyday Americans."
287
Karine Jean-Pierre
Slightly Positive
00:58:51-00:59:08 (17 sec)
"That's an economic policy that we believe in and a policy that builds the economy from the bottom up, middle out, not trickle down. And so we're going to continue to lower cost and we're going to ask those billionaires and corporations to actually pay their fair share. That's something Americans want to see."
288
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:59:08-00:59:25 (17 sec)
"That's something Americans want to see. As it relates to inflation, we look at a trend here and we have seen inflation moderate over the past several months and that's important as well to note. But look, we see it very differently. We want to make sure we're protecting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, lowering costs."
289
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
00:59:25-00:59:33 (8 sec)
"Republicans don't want to protect that, and they want to give billionaires and corporations a tax break. That's not how we see this."
290
Question
Neutral
00:59:33-00:59:34 (1 sec)
"A follow --"
291
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:59:34-00:59:35 (1 sec)
"Yeah, sure."
292
Question
Very Positive
00:59:35-00:59:50 (15 sec)
"Follow-up. Earlier, there was reports that the administration or at least the Department of Justice and they haven't commented on it, may have reached the courts or reaching out to Julian Assange for a plea deal. Any update from you guys here as to whether or not there would be a pardon, or you would support a plea deal?"
293
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:59:50-00:59:52 (2 sec)
"That's a Department of Justice question."
294
Question
Neutral
00:59:52-00:59:53 (1 sec)
"But the president --"
295
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:59:53-00:59:55 (2 sec)
"That that is a Department of Justice question. I'm not going to get into --"
296
Question
Neutral
00:59:55-00:59:57 (2 sec)
"And they're not responding to it. [Inaudible]."
297
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
00:59:57-00:59:59 (2 sec)
"I would refer you to Department of Justice. Go ahead."
298
Question
Very Positive
00:59:59-01:00:24 (25 sec)
"Thank you. So this week, a ton of people will be here for the National Cannabis Policy Summit and there's currently still a patchwork of state marijuana laws to regulate the drug safety, including whether there are traces of lead in products. Since marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, but becoming more common at the state level, is the administration doing anything to try to improve safety regulations of products or any consideration of legalizing marijuana moving forward at the federal level?"
299
Karine Jean-Pierre
Somewhat Positive
01:00:24-01:00:49 (26 sec)
"So I will give you a little bit of an update. So as you all know, the president asked secretary of HHS and the attorney general to initiate the administrative process to review how marijuana is scheduled. HHS has concluded their independent review guided by the evidence. The scheduling review is now with DOJ and any input should be certainly directed to them at a time and in a manner they say is appropriate."
300
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
01:00:49-01:01:03 (14 sec)
"So this is a matter at this point now that HHS has completed their review, it's the Department of Justice and they can speak to where marijuana rescheduling is at this point. All right. Oh, go ahead. Go ahead, Jal."
301
Question
Slightly Positive
01:01:03-01:01:13 (10 sec)
"Thanks, Karine. I'm just wondering, looking backwards, the 2020 election cycle, so you're not impacting the upcoming elections, right, but let's head backwards."
302
Karine Jean-Pierre
Positive
01:01:13-01:01:16 (2 sec)
"OK. See where this is going."
303
Question
Very Negative
01:01:16-01:01:17 (2 sec)
"No, actually, no, you don't know where it's going."
304
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Negative
01:01:17-01:01:24 (7 sec)
"No, I didn't say that. I said, let's see where this is going. I have no idea where this is going. I have no clue."
305
Question
Neutral
01:01:24-01:01:24 ( sec)
"[Inaudible]"
306
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
01:01:24-01:01:27 (3 sec)
"I know you will. I know you will."
307
Question
Neutral
01:01:27-01:01:39 (12 sec)
"In 2020, do you think that the American electorate was helped by seeing Donald Trump and Joe Biden on the same stage at the same time --"
308
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
01:01:39-01:01:41 (2 sec)
"Now, I know where this is going."
309
Question
Positive
01:01:41-01:01:45 (4 sec)
"-- at a presidential debate? Was that helpful, do you think, in terms of people making that decision?"
310
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
01:01:45-01:01:49 (5 sec)
"That's a question for the American people. I can't speak to that from here. I can't."
311
Question
Slightly Positive
01:01:49-01:01:50 ( sec)
"Yeah."
312
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
01:01:50-01:01:54 (4 sec)
"And 2020 was a different time. It was a different time."
313
Question
Positive
01:01:54-01:02:03 (9 sec)
"And looking ahead to this upcoming election cycle, do you think it would be helpful to see these two candidates who are in a rematch?"
314
Karine Jean-Pierre
Neutral
01:02:03-01:02:05 (2 sec)
"So slick. So slick."
315
Question
Neutral
01:02:05-01:02:09 (4 sec)
"At the same time, also competing against each other [Inaudible]?"
316
Karine Jean-Pierre
Very Positive
01:02:09-01:02:29 (19 sec)
"As the president would say, you can't kid a kidder. What I will say is that is a question for the campaign. They will gladly -- I'm sure gladly take that question. All right, everybody. Thank you so much. Thanks for your patience. I know it was a long one."
317