So, thank you very much everybody. Gianni Infantino is the head of FIFA. He’s the biggest man in soccer. And we are, as you probably know, getting the World Cup in 2026 for the United States. Some of it is a partnership with Mexico and Canada. And it’s coming into the United States for a large percentage of the games, and we’re very excited about it. Plus, Gianni and I just had a meeting on women’s soccer and what everybody is going to do to make that even better and more equitable, et cetera, et cetera. So, Gianni, thank you very much. We had a great meeting. Very big, though -- we’re getting the World Cup in 2026, so that’s a big thing. Gianni, thank you for being here. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Well, indeed, it’s fantastic to be here and to boost even more soccer in this country. Soccer, which is the number one global sport. World Cup 2026 taking place here. But we start already now. It’s the biggest event ever. It’s more than 4 billion viewers all around the world. And we will make it the biggest not only sports event, but the biggest social event that we can think of. Soccer, which is a big part of this country as well. And women’s soccer, where you are world champion, there is much more to do. The President was saying this to me and he is right. And we are working on that and we will announce very soon some new initiatives. Thank you. Well, Gianni, we’re going to have to extend my second term because 2026 -- I’m going to have to extend it for a couple of years. I don’t think any of you would have a problem with that. But I hope you’re going to remember me in 2026. For sure. Oh, for sure. [Laughs] Thank you very much, Gianni. Thank you. You take care of yourself. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. President, are peace talks with the Taliban dead? Say it? Are peace talks with the Taliban dead? And why did you -- They're dead. They're dead. As far as I’m concerned, they’re dead. They thought that they had to kill people in order to put themselves in a little better negotiating position. When they did that, they killed 12 people. One happened to be a great American soldier -- a wonderful young man from Puerto Rico. Family is from Puerto Rico. And you can’t do that. You can’t do that with me. So they’re dead, as far as I’m concerned. And we’ve hit the Taliban harder in the last four days than they’ve been hit in over 10 years. So that’s the way it is. Did you get talked out of that meeting with Taliban? Say it? What? Did your administration, did your advisors, talk you out of that meeting with the Taliban? No. Actually, in terms of advisors, I took my own advice. I liked the idea of meeting. I’ve met with a lot of bad people and a lot of good people during the course of the last almost three years. And I think meeting is a great thing. I think that meeting with -- you know, you’re talking about war. There are meetings with war. Otherwise, wars would never end. You’d have them going forever. We had a meeting scheduled. It was my idea, and it was my idea to terminate it. I didn’t even -- I didn’t discuss it with anybody else. When I heard, very simply, that they killed one of our soldiers and 12 other innocent people, I said, “There’s no way I’m meeting on that basis. There’s no way I’m meeting.” They did a mistake. And, by the way, they are telling people they made a big mistake. They’re saying it loud and clear that they made a big mistake. John. Mr. President, why did you want to have them at Camp David? And what will you do about Afghanistan now? Well, Camp David has held meetings with a lot of people that would have been perceived as being pretty tough customers and pretty bad people. There have been plenty of so-called "bad people" brought up to Camp David for meetings. And the alternative was the White House, and you wouldn’t have been happy with that either. So Camp David would have been a good place, but I don’t want to meet under circumstances where they go around and try and make themselves a little bit more important by killing a soldier; by killing, actually, also a great NATO soldier, in addition to our soldier; and also a total of 12 people. I don’t want that. But, you know, Camp David has had many meetings that, I guess, people would not have considered politically correct. Yes, Steve. Are you still going to draw down troops there? Or what’s the status of that? Well, we’re looking at that, and we’re thinking about it. You know, as I’ve said, we’ve been policemen there for a long time. And the government is going to have to take responsibility or do whatever it is they do. I’ve been saying, from the campaign, that we want to get out at the earliest possible time. We’re doing a very good job. Our soldiers are incredible, but they’re serving as policemen, to a large extent. I just made a statement on it. Yeah, we’d like to get out, but we’ll get out at the right time. [Inaudible] What? Can I ask a question on India and Pakistan, sir? Can I ask a question on India and Pakistan? Do you intend to (inaudible -- Prime Minister Modi? Well, India and Pakistan are having a conflict over Kashmir, as you know. I think it’s a little bit less heated right now than it was two weeks ago, and I’m willing to help them. I get along with both countries very well. I’m willing to help them if they want. They know that that is out there. David. Mr. President, are you willing to debate the Republicans who are running against you? You know, I don’t even know who they are, other than I know that -- Joe Walsh, Mark Sanford. I guess -- I guess you could say -- no, but I don’t know them. I don’t know them. I would say this: They’re all at less than 1 percent. It’s a -- I guess it’s a publicity stunt. We just got right -- a little while ago, 94 percent popularity or approval rating within the Republican Party. So, to be honest, I’m not looking to give them any credibility. They have no credibility. One was a person that voted for Obama, ran as a Vice President four years ago, and was soundly defeated. Another one got thrown out after one term in Congress and he lost in a landslide. And the third one -- Mr. Tallahassee Trail or Appalachian Trail -- he’s the Appalachian Trail, right? The Tallahassee Trail is nice, too, but I think he was the Appalachian Trail. But he wasn’t on the Appalachian Trail; he was in Argentina. Yeah, go ahead. Are you okay with using the military as the police force on our southern border? Say it louder. Are you okay with using the military as a police force on our southern border? Well, right now, Mexico has been doing a great job for us. And, frankly, we’re very appreciative. But we’ve also been very -- pretty rapidly changing the regulations, the rules, winning in court. We’ve had a lot of wins. We did it early on, but we’re having a lot of wins in court right now. The courts are backing us up, and that has a lot to do with our success on the southern border. In addition, a lot of wall is being built. And every time we put up a mile of wall, that helps us a lot. Are you prepared to offer temporary protected status to people from the Bahamas? So, we’re talking to a lot of different people on that. You know, we’re recovering from the hurricane also. Florida did get hit -- not as hard as we anticipated. And you look at Georgia. You look at South Carolina, North Carolina. I’m going to North Carolina right now -- North Carolina -- to have a rally for Dan Bishop. But before I go to the rally, we’re going to be stopping at one of the sites that got hit very hard by the hurricane. So we’re also recovering from a hurricane. But we have to be very careful. Everybody needs totally proper documentation because the -- look, the Bahamas had some tremendous problems with people going to the Bahamas that weren’t supposed to be there. I don’t want to allow people that weren’t supposed to be in the Bahamas to come into the United States, including some very bad people and some very bad gang members and some very, very bad drug dealers. So we are going to be very, very strong on that. Let me -- let me just explain. Large sections, believe it or not, of the Bahamas were not hit. And what we’re doing is bringing the people to those sections of the Bahamas that have not been hit. We’ve done a lot of the USAID. We’ve done a lot of work with our Coast Guard, with our FEMA people, who have been phenomenal. I mean, they have been phenomenal. So we’ll see what happens. We’ll see what happens. On North Korea, sir -- on North Korea, when’s the last time you heard from Chairman Kim? Well, I saw a statement was just put out having to do with North Korea, and that’ll be interesting. We’ll see. It just came out over the wires a little while ago. So, we’ll see what happens. In the meantime -- in the meantime, we have our hostages back, we’re getting the remains of our great heroes back, and we’ve had no nuclear testing for a long time. Mr. President, on the Ninth District Court judge that continues to issue nationwide injunctions -- Yeah. The Ninth District Court Judge -- Judge Tigar. Do you think it’s constitutional for a judge -- Again. What was the beginning? With the judge in the Ninth District Court -- the San Francisco judge that continues to issue nationwide injunctions on immigration policy, do you think that’s constitutional? I think it’s very unfair that he does that. I don’t think it should be allowed, and we’ll see what happens. There’s a lot of new law being made on that, but we don’t think that should be happening. Now, with that being said, we’re starting to do very well in the Ninth Circuit. We’re starting to do well all over. We won the lawsuit on the wall. We won the lawsuit on a lot of different things having to do with illegal immigration. That’s why a lot of our very strong points are coming out. And in addition to Mexico helping us, we’re ending up with some great legal victories now on illegal immigration. That’s one of the reasons we’re doing so well. Are you going to impose tariffs on Mexico if it doesn’t do more on illegal immigration? Go ahead. Go. [Inaudible] What? Go ahead. What? Mr. President, yesterday you tweeted that there are -- the prisoner swap between Russia and Ukraine was the first -- perhaps the first giant step towards peace. So, do you think the United States should join these talks and should join Germany, France, Russia, and Ukraine within the talks called Normandy Format? I think the fact that the prisoner swap took place yesterday with Russia and Ukraine is a very big step and that’s a very positive step. If they needed me to get involved, I’d get involved, but that’s really a very, very positive event that took place yesterday. Are you concerned that the significant drop in illegal border crossings is only temporary and, as Mark Morgan said -- Well, you're always concerned that it’s temporary. But we now have much better legal protection. And we’d have total protection if the Democrats would get rid of the loopholes which are there. They could do it in, as I say, 15 minutes if they would get rid of the loopholes and fix asylum. But they don’t want to do that. They don’t want to do it. The Democrats want open borders. It means crime. It means drugs. It means human trafficking. And that’s what they want. And if they want to run on that, they can run on it. But our people -- a lot of the people in this country -- and, I would say, a very large percentage of people -- they don’t want to have crossings illegal. They don’t want to have open borders. They want to have a strong border. And I’ve always said: Without a border, we don’t have a country. And without a country, I’ll tell you what: We wouldn’t be -- without that border being strong -- we are securing the border like it hasn’t been before. And when the wall is built -- and it’s moving rapidly right now. It’s moving very rapidly. The lawsuit wins, the legal wins. We’ve won a lot. And we’ve won a lot in the courts over the last year. You know, if you look at the beginning, where we were losing, we will have about 180 judges approved over the next three or four weeks -- 180. When I came in, President Obama gave us a beautiful gift. He gave us 138 judges that he wasn’t able to get in or didn’t pick anybody, or couldn’t get them approved. One hundred and thirty-eight. I took that. And now, when you add the other that came through attrition and other things that have happened, we’ll have about 180 judges approved very, very quickly. Tomorrow’s special election -- tomorrow’s special election in North Carolina, how important is it for your reelection? Well, Dan Bishop is a great gentleman, a great man. He’s going to be a great -- I think he’s going to be a great congressman. It was a very close race. I think it’s getting less close. If you look at the numbers from two weeks ago -- and I got involved about two weeks ago -- and the numbers have gone way up. I think Dan has a very good chance of winning the election. Again, I’m not running, but I have a lot of respect for Dan Bishop. I’m going there now to help him campaign. We’re going to be doing a big rally tonight; totally sold out as always. Every single one totally sold out. There will be a lot of people outside trying to get in. But it’s all in honor of Dan Bishop. North Carolina, I hope they’re going to go out and vote. On Iran, sir. On Iran, will you -- will you meet with Rouhani? Would you meet with Rouhani -- President Rouhani? It could happen. It could happen. Yeah. No problem with meeting. Iran should straighten out because, frankly, they’re in very bad position right now and they should straighten it out, because they could straighten it out very easily. Will you respond to the reports today that say that you have mishandled classified information to Russia? No, I know nothing about it. I see the CIA responded perfectly. So whatever the CIA said is fine with me. But I heard they responded perfectly. I know nothing. Mr. President -- Mr. President, how soon will you reveal your gun control proposal? How soon? This week? Next week? Well, we’re dealing with Democrats. We’re dealing with Republicans. We’re talking about a lot of different things having to do with, as you call it, gun control. But we are talking about a lot of different things. But at the same time, we have to protect our Second Amendment very strongly, and we will always do that. Steve. Aren’t there some internal divisions among your team about how to go forward on Afghanistan? Well, my decision was to have a meeting. And I said, “You know what? I don’t like the concept of having it at the White House. That would be a step too far.” There have been many very powerful meetings at Camp David having to do with enemies -- real enemies, very big enemies, war -- and I thought Camp David would be good, and I still do. The only reason I canceled that meeting is because they killed one of our soldiers and they killed a total of 12 people, trying to build up their importance, because they think that’s important -- except, to me, it backfired. And they’re very upset. They feel that they blew it. And they said it loud and clear. They feel they made a big mistake by doing what they did. Is your administration still looking at designating human smuggling operations at the border as foreign terrorist organizations? We’re looking very much at human smuggling. And if you look at “trafficking,” they call it -- if you look at what’s going on with the human trafficking, we’re bringing it down to a much lower level. This should have been done for years and years. But we’re bringing the human trafficking, as you can see by the numbers, we’re bringing it down. Mostly affects women and children. It’s a terrible thing. It’s been going on for many years, and we’re bringing it down. Are you concerned about Kim Jong Un’s -- are you concerned about Kim Jong Un -- he will not keep the promise? Well, it just came out over the wires that he’d like to have a meeting. I have a very good relationship with Chairman Kim -- Kim Jong Un. And it just came out; I just saw it as I’m coming out here -- it just came out that they would like to meet. We’ll see what happens. But I always say having meetings is a good thing, not a bad thing. On the Bahamas -- are you concerned about China’s relief efforts in the Bahamas? No, I’m not. Let people go in and help. The Bahamas got hit like no thing that I’ve ever seen. I’ve never seen a hurricane with -- it was like a massive tornado, more than a hurricane. It got hit like nothing I’ve seen. Anybody who wants to help, that’s okay with me. I think it’s a good thing. Mr. President, how do you define -- how do you define victory in Afghanistan? Well, that’s always the question: How do you define victory? We beat them militarily, but as soon as leave, it seems to form again. We would beat them very easily, militarily, if we wanted to, by doing certain things. And I’m not talking nuclear. We could have that over with very, very rapidly. But you’d lose millions and billions of lives, and I don’t want to do that. Afghanistan is a very interesting situation. We’ve been there for 19 years. Nineteen years. And we’re now really policemen in Afghanistan. So what’s happening is this: We’re talking. We’re talking to the government. We’re talking to a lot of different people. And we’ll see. But I canceled Camp David on the basis that they did something that they sure as hell shouldn’t have done. Mr. President, do you see tomorrow’s election in North Carolina as a bellwether for next year’s election? No. I don’t see it as a bellwether. They always ask that question. I mean, you never see talk about the fact -- as an example, in ’18 -- that we won the Senate. Nobody ever talks about that. The Senate being very important, because that’s how I’m getting all the judges approved. It doesn’t go through the House; it goes through the Senate. So I’m getting all these judges. We’ll be up -- as I said, we’ll be up to 180 judges, plus two Supreme Court judges. And I don’t know if there has ever been a record like that. President Obama gave me a beautiful birthday present when he gave me 138 judges that weren’t approved. And, frankly, how do you consider that being a great President when you hand to the opposition 138 slots of federal judges, including appellate court judges and one Supreme Court judge? So that’s the story, where we got two Supreme Court justices and we’ll have, in a very short number of weeks, 180 judges approved, including appellate. And that number, from 180, will easily and rather rapidly go over 200. And I don’t think there’s been anything like it. Mr. President, what specific number of troops -- what specific number of troops should remain in Afghanistan? What do you want to see now? I would never tell you. I’ll tell some people, but I’d never tell you. But we have -- we have a very specific number. We have a very specific number. So, to follow up what John asked: For 2020, you don’t see as a bellwether, the election tomorrow. No, I don’t see it as a bellwether. But are you concerned about the Senate races in 2020? Look, I have to run. Here's what it is. Do you think you’ll hold on to the Senate? I think we did great in ’18, because the congressmen -- like Andy Barr in Kentucky and others -- that I campaigned for, they won. Andy Barr was behind. I went to Kentucky. I campaigned for him. I held one or two rallies, and the great state of Kentucky brought him. And, by the way, the same person that we defeated there is now running against Mitch McConnell for the Senate. And he’s going to win. He’s going to win. Kentucky is an incredible place. They know. They don’t give up the most powerful man in the United States Senate for a freshman senator. You just don’t do it. Kentucky is very smart. They know exactly what they’re doing. But I campaigned for senators. We were supposed to lose the Senate, according to some of you. We ended up picking up two seats, which was fantastic. I get no credit for that. If we didn’t pick up those two seats -- I just told you we’re going to have 180 judges approved -- we wouldn’t have had almost any judges approved, from the point of the election. So we’re very happy with the way we’ve done. The ’18 election -- the big thing was, I was not running. You know, people say, “Oh, it was a referendum on Trump.” It wasn’t. I’m not running; people are running. But I will go and help Dan Bishop. I’m going to be there in a little while. And I assume some of you, I’ll be seeing. Mr. President, on Turnberry: Will you discourage the Pentagon from having troops stay overnight at your properties? I haven’t found out -- other than when a plane stops at a massive international airport and gets fuel -- I don’t own the airport. When pilots stay -- I own a lot of different places. Soon you’ll find that out because I’ll be, at some point prior to the election, I’m going to be giving out a financial report of me. And it will be extremely complete. I’m going to give out -- I’m going to give or my financial condition. And you’ll be extremely shocked that the numbers are many, many times what you think. I don’t need to have somebody take a room overnight in a hotel. What is happening is the following: Every time you find a person landing an airplane within 500 miles of something I own -- Mike Pence, as an example, his family lives in Doonbeg, Ireland. And he’s actually told me that he stayed there many years ago at the same -- I bought it years ago -- but he was there before I bought it, I believe, he said. A long time ago. But he was in Ireland, so he said, “You know what I’ll do? I’ll see my family.” I didn’t know about that, but I can say he has good taste. Mr. President, what do you make of states canceling Republican primaries? Of who? Of states canceling Republican primaries. I have nothing to do with that. Are you worried that you might lose some of those primaries? No. Because, look, the three people are a total joke. They’re a joke. They’re a laughing stock. And I have nothing to do -- the four states that canceled it don’t want to waste their money. If there was a race, they would certainly want to do that. But they’re considered to be a laughing stock. They’re considered to be a joke. And those four states don’t want to waste their money. Having primary campaigns and having a primary election is very expensive. Have you ruled out a future meeting with the Taliban? Are there preconditions under which you would meet them? We haven’t discussed it. I’m not looking to discuss it. We’ve hit the Taliban and our enemy in Afghanistan harder than we have in over 10 years. So I’m not discussing anything right now. [Inaudible] recent GOP congressional retirements -- does that concern you for 2020? Well, one of the things is that I disagree with the Republican system. When you’re the chairman of a committee -- we’ve lost chairmen because they can’t go from being a chairman, back to being a regular congressman or woman. When you’re the chairman of a committee, the Democrats, you can stay there forever, like Deny [Sic] Hoyer and others. He’s a good man, by the way. But like a lot of them, they’re there forever. As a Republican, you get six years. What happens after they’re finished, they leave. And I understand that. And, frankly, there is good to be said about both and there’s bad to be said about both, to use the famous expression. But let me just tell you, I agree -- one of the only things I agree with the Democrats on: I really think it’s better to have a longer term. On China, Mr. President, do you sense a real shift in the Chinese position on intellectual property theft, forced technology transfer? We have to stop forced technology, international technology theft. If you look at what’s going on: Intellectual property theft with China -- just so you understand, our country is doing phenomenally well. You know, there’s a chance -- I don’t want to talk about it -- but over a very short period of time that we’ll hit a yet new record. I think we have 118 records for hitting the top stock market. Two weeks ago, the fake news was trying to convince people that maybe there’s a possibility for a recession. Well, a lot of things have happened, very positive. We’re doing very well against China and we could very well have a new high in our stock market. We have gained trillions of dollars of worth, and China has lost many, many trillions of dollars, including 3 million jobs, including companies that are leaving China. Yes, they want to negotiate very badly. Thank you. Thank you.