Joining us now for reaction is Congressman Devin Nunues, the Republican chairman of the House Intel Committee. Congressman, you look great at this hour. Great to be on with you. Thanks for being with us on our first show. OK, so where are we now on this? Make it easy for our viewers to understand and follow this. Where are we today? So there's a lot of moving parts. So let's start with we still have information from Fusion GPS that we need from the bank. We still have a whole host of information from the Department of Justice and FBI that we hope to begin to get tomorrow. So we are just really at the beginning of unraveling questions that we've been asking since March. And let me go to what Mr. Gowdy's comment was there. If people really believe that the FBI did not know who paid for that dossier, I've got a bridge to sell you. There is no possible way that the FBI did not know who paid for that dossier. And, yet, month after month after month -- Who lying at the FBI? Who specifically -- We don't know is it just Comey or is it the whole FBI? And let's just take -- What you are saying about the FBI there, that's quite a charge. Absolutely. This is the government out of control. That this is -- we hear about deep state, we hear about forces burrowed in the government working against the people's interest, the need to know, transparency in government. It's not OK for us to ask, since March, who paid for the dossier, what did you use the dossier for? And then it comes out only because of subpoenas to the bank and the bank was going to have to produce the subpoenas. Then all of a sudden they cut a deal. Then they cut a deal. Now, where are we with these bank records? I read today that you're in the process of getting them, and did they just willingly turn them over? We're fighting in court. Because that's the key, right? Seeing where the money went specifically and will it illustrate for what? Well, we have a whole bunch of questions about Fusion GPS. So there is a whole host. We want to know, were they being paid by Russians? Were they paying Russians? Well, they have Russian clients. They said they separated, right? They separated the Russian clients from the Clinton DNC work. That's what they claim. So they say but, look, we're investigating this. Yes. We need the information. We have the FBI and other agencies who either didn't tell us who paid for the dossier or didn't know, which would be equally disturbing. But my guess is somebody over there knew who paid for the dossier. Should Mueller resign as special prosecutor given the potential conflicts of interest regarding something that may in fact be Russia collusion during the campaign? He was FBI director, correct? Number one, I'm very concerned about it, OK. But let's see. Today he had these initial indictments. I think you could run a show earlier the right way, which is there is nothing there. Let's see where he goes from here. If this continues to drag on and on and on, then we're going to have a problem because right now what I see is we have Fusion GPS obstructing the investigation, the Democrats obstructing our investigation, and the government, the executive branch obstructing our investigation. Could Obama have known about this? Well, he was briefed on the dossier. In January, supposedly he didn't know anything about it beforehand. Why would he? But this was $10 billion paid to Perkins Coie law firm that then funneled it to Fusion GPS. Why did the payment go that way? Why did it go to the law firm, law firm to Fusion, Fusion to Christopher Steele who got the information from Russia? To cover the tracks. To cover the tracks. Right. And I think it's hard to believe that when President Obama was being briefed on this dossier that all of his intelligence people, the best intelligence agencies in the world, had no idea who paid for that information. Adam Schiff, your Democrat counterpart has said that you have become, you, have become an obstacle to the Trump-Russia collusion investigation because, you know, you stepped aside and then you didn't step aside. Can you clear that up for us, because that's confusing to people. People think you recused yourself but you never did. There is a lot of crazy things that the media, the mainstream media says about me and others. But the bottom line is this. We are being obstructed in this investigation. We have for a long time. There is no question that I was attacked viciously by the left. You are well aware of it, to try to get me off this -- They were trying to intimidate you from speaking out which is what they do to a lot of people, did they not? That's what they did, yes. Remember, it was all over me originally going to the White House saying that -- That you looked at these documents. I looked at documents -- The unmasking. -- where Trump administration officials had been unmasked. Right. Some of those ended up in the media. This is a major problem with leaks from our intelligence agencies. Deep state is leaking. They're leaking to make you look bad. And are you going to bring back Susan Rice and these others to testify? Samantha Power, bringing them back? Unfortunately we are going to bring back a lot of the people, or the DOJ could do their job and begin to investigate this. I'm not thinking Bob Mueller is going to rush to that, but maybe I'm just being pessimistic. Thank you very much, congressman. Congratulations on your show. And directly ahead, another Hollywood creep exposed, and the mainstream media hits a new low in its response.